He was the son of actor Errol Flynn who, after trying his hand at acting, became a photojournalist in the mid-60s and in Vietnam was known, as Page, as one of the high-risk photographers. He was captured in Cambodia in 1960 by Communist forces with another of the "high-risk", Dana Stone.
Interesting bit of trivia, here. On the stretcher is a wounded Tim Page. Man on the right, holding the stretcher, is photographer Sean Flynn. He was the son of actor Errol Flynn who, after trying his hand at acting, became a photojournalist in the mid-60s and in Vietnam was known, as Page, as one of the high-risk photographers. He was captured in Cambodia in 1960 by Communist forces with another of the "high-risk", Dana Stone. Both were never heard of again. Page went back to Cambodia in 1990 trying to find out what happened to them.
Thanks for posting this. I find it intriguing how much the Vietnam war photojournalists impacted many of this community - myself included.
I've tweaked the thread title and moved this thread from the In Memoriam sub-forum to the Photographers forum. In Memoriam is actually there to report the passing of those who are part of the APUG/DPUG/Photrio community, plus (in a few cases) people with a strong connection with our community.
Vietnam was the first and last war that the military allowed unfettered access to reporters. Because of that, so many photos were so impactful changing what many thought of the war and war itself.
Alan, I almost agree. However many dedicated photojournalists covered the subsequent wars in Latin America... many have died in Mexico as a result and are continuing to document those horrors.
Life Magazine and our TV sets didn't really change what people thought about "war itself." For example, there's a lot of photography and videography in Ukraine. As well, America never saw much (any?) of the VC photography that's beginning to surface. We saw lots of fine war photography in the Middle East, perhaps most notably Life Magazine's coverage of Kuwait.
Sorry that Mr. Page has passed away, though it seems he certainly did live a full life. Interesting that in the photo in post #6, he appears to be carrying a rifle -- I rather thought that members of the press, even our perhaps especially in a war zone, generally did not bear a weapon in order to avoid being targeted as an active combatant.
I have to add that I like the quote by Bill Brandt in post #8. Something to think about...
Alex, I recall this also as you've mentioned. Always a bit haunting as Sean's dad was truly a part of Hollywood history.
I believe Sean had little or no contact with his famous father, and was raised by his mother, Errol's ex-wife, actress Lili Damita. Sean received $5000 at Errol's death but little else in his lifetime.
Parents divorced in 1942. Sean's letters were auctioned in 2015 and they do show that father and son did not get along. Errol seems to have been quite the jackass. Love the David Niven quote: "You always knew where you stood with Errol. He always let you down."
https://www.express.co.uk/entertain...etters-reveal-rift-Errol-Flynn-son-Sean-Flynn
Interesting part of the article is the quote from a Sean Flynn interview: "I found out right away that I liked the... it is hard to say you like war. But I liked the excitement. I felt my strength would be my ability to function under fire, in this case to perform as a photographer. All the photos I took were bad - underexposed. But I was glad to be in Vietnam. Maybe it was proving something. A lot gets lost in perspective, a lot of old personal battles. After you get the s*** scared out of you a few times, it is easy to look back and forget what was actually going on in your mind."
You have to have a heck of a chip on your shoulder to find that what you need to prove yourself is photographing the hell that was Vietnam.
If you are a photographer/helicopter door-gunner in VN, like the guy who sold me the Graflex XL kit he'd stolen, are you a "war photographer" or instrument of war?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?