Tiffen filter wratten equivilents

Bushland Stairway

Bushland Stairway

  • 3
  • 1
  • 36
Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 6
  • 3
  • 83
Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 101
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 78

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,234
Messages
2,788,329
Members
99,837
Latest member
Agelaius
Recent bookmarks
0

Radioiron

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Messages
43
Format
Large Format
Does anyone know what a tiffen green 1 filter is eqivelent to in wratten numbers? I've searched everywhere and can't even come up with spectral transmission to match to regular filters.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,566
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I happen to be doing a search on Wratten filters with the 'special dyes' tonight. The Kodak site is useless. The "Help" section gave zero hits for Wratten. The technical search informed me that the 'special dyes' were "Used to alter the color wavelength of light." (Duhh..)

Anyway, I came across this stuff that may answer your question.

Select Tiffen spectra:
Tiffenspectrum.jpg


Select Kodak Wratten spectra:

Wratten.gif
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
An older Wratten filter designation used letters and numbers. Newer Wratten nomenclature uses numbers, sometimes followed by a letter. Hoya uses letter+number, but often shortens the designation to letter only. B+W uses a three digit number code, and Schott uses two letters + a three digit number.

Tiffen Green 1 is a Wratten #11, and their green 2 is a Wratten #13. Tiffen also makes a Green 56 and Green 58, which are the same as Wratten #56 and #58. The current Tiffen numbers 1 and 2 are probably shortened forms of Wratten letter+number designations. The Wratten #11 was also an X1, and is equivalent to the G11 or 060 filters in other systems. The Wratten #13 is also an X2, and called the 061 in other systems. Both the #11 and #13 are yellow-green.

Astrophotography books refer to the Wratten #13 as a "more efficient" version of the #11. The #11 and #13 pass the 480-580 nm spectrum, and the #11 has a filter factor of 4 and the #13 a factor of 5. I suspect that the "more efficient" comment means that the #13 has a sharper cutoff, i.e. is better at blocking unwanted wavelengths outside the passband.

The Wratten #56 passband is listed as 490-580, and the #58 as 505-560.

B&H tends to list multiple filter designations on their web site, so you might find that helpful.

Lee
 

Mike Wilde

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
2,903
Location
Misissauaga
Format
Multi Format
While not necessarily of perfect optical grade, theatre lighting gels can work very well for many photo situations - get an old wratten filter holder for the front of you lens to hold them, or improvise.

I would suggest that about $50 spent on a designers swatchbook from Roscoe or Lee - makers of theatrical lighting filter gel would be money very well spent.
They are about 2"x5", and include the spectral transmission curve.
There are smaller swatch books that are 1" x 2.5" that have the same infomation, but clipping gels from these only gives filters big enoygh for most point and shoot lenses.
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Astrophotography books refer to the Wratten #13 as a "more efficient" version of the #11. The #11 and #13 pass the 480-580 nm spectrum, and the #11 has a filter factor of 4 and the #13 a factor of 5. I suspect that the "more efficient" comment means that the #13 has a sharper cutoff, i.e. is better at blocking unwanted wavelengths outside the passband.
That's not it.
The 13 absorbs more red than the 11. The behaviour of both at wavelengths shorter than about 590 nm is virtually identical.
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
That's not it.
The 13 absorbs more red than the 11. The behaviour of both at wavelengths shorter than about 590 nm is virtually identical.
In what way is that not "better at blocking unwanted wavelengths outside the passband", e.g. blocking more red and/or blue?

Lee
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Both block unwanted wavelengths outside the passband. Their passbands are slightly different.

The one does not have a sharper cutoff than the other.
The behaviour of both at wavelengths shorter than about 590 nm is virtually identical. The 11 is more transparent for red and near infra red than the 13.
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
OK, so you're saying the efficieny refers to a deeper rather than steeper red cutoff. I don't have, and can't find a Tiffen curve for the #13, only B+W 060 and 061, and they often differ significantly on "equivalent" filters from Tiffen.

The OP might appreciate your posting the Tiffen curves you're using.

Lee
 

Q.G.

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
5,535
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
I'm not using Tiffen curves. I was - like you - writing about Kodak Wratten filters.

I have those curves on paper (Kodak booklet). Alas no digital version.
 

papicek

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
1
Location
Massachusetts
Format
35mm
If you still have the round filter case the Tiffen filters came packaged in, you'll find a round label on the bottom with Tiffen's f-stop recommendations. For the #11 (Wratten), G1 (Tiffen) filter, it suggests 2 stops extra exposure.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom