The Zone VI 8x10 Woodfield

Sanjay Sen

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
1,246
Location
New York, NY
Format
Multi Format
Hi all,

I am looking for some information on the Zone VI 8x10 Woodfield camera - specifications (min/max bellows, movements, etc.) and reviews/opinions from users. I did try a Google search as well as a search on this site, but without much success. So, I would appreciate if anybody could direct me to a site with the relevant info, or post them on this thread.

Any help is much appreciated.



Best wishes,
 

Oren Grad

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,619
Format
Large Format
There were two versions, the original and the Ultralight, with the latter discontinued only recently.

From a 1993 Zone VI catalog in my file, I find the following specifications for the original version:

Bellows draw: 34"
Folded dimensions: 12.5"x14.75"x4.75"
Weight: 13.7lb
Front swing: 15 degrees
Front base tilt: 45 degrees
Axis tilt: unlimited
Front rise and fall: 6" travel
Front lateral shift: 3" travel
Rear swing: 12 degrees
Rear tilt: 45 degrees
Made of Honduran mahogany and brass

At the moment I can't lay my hands on a Calumet catalog for data on the Ultralight. If I find it I'll check back here and post the info if nobody else has done so.
 

Rob Skeoch

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Apr 25, 2005
Messages
1,346
Location
Grand Valley, Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Thanks for posting Oren.... where there some later models of the original 8x10 that had the up-dated gold platted knobs. Maybe not that useful but they might help date a camera.
-Rob
 
OP
OP

Sanjay Sen

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
1,246
Location
New York, NY
Format
Multi Format
Thanks, Oren, for the specs. Those are what I was after. Thanks also to all who responded so quickly!

BTW, does anybody have feedback on this Zone VI 8x10 model? I would be interested in hearing from you....



Best wishes,
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
BTW, does anybody have feedback on this Zone VI 8x10 model? I would be interested in hearing from you....

I've had my Zone VI 8x10 for almost 2 years now. I especially like the long bellows extension, sturdiness and bail back. I also own a Wisner 8x10 with 24" of bellows extension. Both are very solid cameras. The Wisner now serves as a back-up camera. With the Wisner, I would occasionally move the camera ever so slightly while loading a film holder (just enough to drive you nuts!). I've never experienced that problem with my Zone VI. My Zone VI has gold plated hardware, I believe the serial number is 238.

Hope this helps,

John
 

dphphoto

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2004
Messages
349
Location
Knoxville, T
Format
Multi Format
Check out this recently completed auction on eBay: item # 150093620586. Look in advanced search. If I knew how to make a link, I would. Dean
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
984
Location
Athens
Format
Medium Format
I own a Zone VI (I don't know what a Woodfield is) 8x10. It sure is heavy and big and it's got brass metal parts... It's not a bad design, once you get used to it... only a bit too heavy to carry around on your shoulders (I mean in a bag)...
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,086
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
BTW, does anybody have feedback on this Zone VI 8x10 model? I would be interested in hearing from you....

I have a Zone VI 8x10...serial number 270. I had my relatively small 8x10 set up on the Sante Fe Plaza during "Big Cameras on the Plaza" Day a few years back. A nice fellow stopped by and gave my camera a good look-over. I offered him a view under the darkcloth, but he declined and said he probably built my camera. But after locating the serial number, he said he had only built the first 250. I am sorry but I can't remember his name, but he told some interesting stories of the challenges of camera manufacture.

Anyway, my camera, either because it is post #250, or it is just fate, does not have the bail handle. I used a bail handle on a 4x5 for years and liked it. Both styles have their advantages...and I suppose an individual would just learn the best way of working with what ever style one owns.

One worriesome design situation I have come across is a lack a sufficient light-trap between the camera body and the back of the camera. I have had a few negs fogged. As long as I check to make sure the body and the back are perfectly alligned (there is a little slop in the fit of my camera) and keep the darkcloth over the back of the camera, I don't have any problems.

I have occasionally (and accidentily) run the standards off the focusing tracks. Its not easy (for me) to get the teeth lined back up again so that the standards are square to the rails. I do not know if this is an issue with other cameras. I have put marks on the camera the keep myself from doing it again.

210mm lenses are easy to use. Using the 159mm gets to be a challenge -- just too much bellows. The camera is steady when stretched out using my 19" lens.

The Zone VI is a heavy camera, as George observed. I just figure a day of carrying it around is a day I get some good exercise. The camera makes up about a third of the weight of my camera pack (without pod). By getting a light weight 8x10, a carbon fiber pod, and losing a couple lenses, I could reduce the weight 10 to 15 pounds...I could no longer afford to actually go anywhere, but I'd have a lighter set-up

It seems to be well made, but perhaps lacking in grace, if that is the right word for it. That's fine with me, since it is not lacking in functionbility and is a solid camera. I have used it is all types of weather and temperatures with no problems. The only problem I have comes from living and photographing here on the NW coast -- then heading to somewhere warm. I will set up the camera, focus, and as I am composing, the image starts to fuzz out. I then have to take the lensboard and back of the camera off to let the steam out. My camera just is not use to having actual sunlight on its bellows.

Vaughn
 
OP
OP

Sanjay Sen

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
1,246
Location
New York, NY
Format
Multi Format
Thanks George and Vaughn for your feedback. This really helps me decide on what to go for.


Best wishes,
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format

Vaughn,

I'd be willing to bet my last dollar that the "nice fellow" was Bruce Barlow. Bruce and Richard Ritter together with Ted Harris run Fine Focus Workshops. Bruce also has some great articles and Large Format tools available on his www.circleofthesunproductions.com website. Bruce worked at Zone VI for a while and helped Richard assemble some of the cameras. If the guy was about 6' 6" tall then it was definitely Bruce.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,086
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format

Thanks! It probably was Bruce then. I considered him to be of average hieght, but then I am 6'4" and played high school and college basketball where I was considered to be a bit on the short side in my positions.

I will check out his website!

Vaughn
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…