• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

The SX-70 Craze...

Oh wait... I'm confusing emulsion lifts and bleaching negatives.

Eta: maybe you can't get a negative from integral film. I think I might have been mentally confusing emulsion lifts and negatives. I've been working nights this week, you'll have to excuse me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

No worries I know that the Fuji type 100 stuff can be bleeched somehow I just don't know how... And that's more interesting to me than the integral stuff anyway lol

Go get some sleep


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It's repaired, refurbed, and recovered!

 
Nice! Wish I had that money, I actually don't like the sonar I have (when it works) I prefer to focus manually, I think part of the issue it has is when I put it on manual there's a malfunction.

Enjoy!


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Some thoughts on SX-70-I have three SX-70's- the Alpha 1 that my mailman gave me, and I reskinned with new leather, and 2 beautiful Sonars, one that was found by my Mom at a thrift shop for $4, and the other that I bought at a pawnshop for $40. They are beautiful cameras. I think Impossible is driving prices upward, and the appeal of restoring and shooting with them is undeniable. The classic Land Camera series cameras are tanks, more reliable, and do yield a better looking print. But if you want to "experiment", sometimes you can get an impossible print that looks like classic SX-70, and sometimes not. The newest formula, PX70 Color Protection, is beautiful, but does have its quirks.