I was watching this film (again) and as I clicked on its Wiki age I read this :
"For Javier Rodriguez's story, the director used tobacco filters and a 45-degree shutter angle whenever possible to produce a strobe-like sharp feel. Then, he took the entire film through an Ektachrome step, which increased the contrast and grain significantly."
I saw this film also. I don´t belive it was filmed with E 6 ....... but I can´t say for sure - I wasn´t at the scene.
Let us notice that it is possible filmed with c-41 Film. And let us believe it is " crossed processed "
but for 1000% sure this was made in post production.
So we saw film in the past as raw - material with some parameters nobody cares about to much. Therefore $490.000,- workstations are rendering
effects and by the time the colors.
This film was directed by Steven Soderderbergh - I think this guy is indeed crazy enough to use real E6 film and by the production notice is mentioned that it was filtered a.s.o.
So if you like it use it with still film for photography.
Take some EPY stuff or use Kodak EPR with heavy filters - perhaps you should have a push 1 / push 2 developement and soon you will
have the exact color management of " Traffic "... !
OK - that makes it quite clear - I was wondering by looking to the production notices what the hell they have done....
Regarding the colors of "Traffic" it seams to be art of course. But c-41 / e6 labs have had the max. of trouble with this kind of colors in the past...
The 16 mm image area is 2.5 times smaller than the 35 mm image area.
The information recorded on a 16 mm frame is less than the information recorded on a 35 mm frame.
The 16 or S 16 mm to 35 mm magnification is not a current operation in any film processing lab.
For this reason, the price of image enlargement from 16 to 35 mm is considerable.
For a feature film, the budget for the film is very little of the total movie budget.
I think financially is no money saving, and the transfer from 16 to 35 mm can mean some loss of film quality.