The Look

Death's Shadow

A
Death's Shadow

  • 2
  • 4
  • 69
Friends in the Vondelpark

A
Friends in the Vondelpark

  • 1
  • 0
  • 85
S/S 2025

A
S/S 2025

  • 0
  • 0
  • 76
Street art

A
Street art

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69
20250427_154237.jpg

D
20250427_154237.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 86

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,454
Messages
2,759,419
Members
99,376
Latest member
jaanus20
Recent bookmarks
0

blindpig

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
123
Location
Nixa,Mo.
Format
Multi Format
Hi Ya'll, I'm back again.
As I am just beginning my paper negative journey am finding more interesting things to wonder about (that's kinda' the fun part).
My actual photo journey is some 40 to 45 years with a 10 year hiatus caused by retirement etc .Finding APUG and in-camera paper negatives has lured me back.
Enough of that I digress,here's my current quandary: Trying not to digress again, What I'm looking for is prints that exhibit tone and density close to the old graded Kodabromide papers. In the late 50's (before Kodak reduced the silver content and multigrade paper came along) prints had a deeper black and cooler tone than is now available. Compared to the available paper the tone was almost blue black not warm beige. I never got into toning (except sepia when called for),am wondering if some type toner is what I should be looking toward.
Guess now that I'm older more contrast and deep blacks appeal to me, more like some of the old William Henry Jackson photos.
I've found that scanning the negatives shot on old outdated paper,processed in dilute developer results in beige/pink(white) areas and inverting the picture in Photoshop results in a contrasty bluish black looking finished product. It's a little too blue but going in the right direction.But dang! I'd rather do it in the darkroom.
Any ideas/suggestions?
Don
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
I think that the change in "the look" of photographic papers had more to do with regulations which required the removal of heavy metals like cadmium and lead from their formulations. The results was a definite change in image quality. Several papers by manufacturers were eliminated because they could no longer be made without these metals.
 
OP
OP

blindpig

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
123
Location
Nixa,Mo.
Format
Multi Format
Gerald,
I suspect you are right about government regulations and probably Kodak etc. didn't mind reducing the silver but continue their current pricing schedule.
Still I'm wondering if some toner might give a similar look,if not guess eventually I'll have to try carbon printing or some such.......
Don
 

MartinP

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
1,569
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Have a look at the new Ilford Coldtone, if you haven't already. At least it might form a good starting point for further work? Something from Moersch might help with a final tonal tweak.

Edit: It's possible that these materials are not available in your market . . .
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,848
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
You would need to tone the final print or negative to get deeper blue-black, selenium or gold toners possibly.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom