I made the mistake of submitting a few of my "known good" lenses to the flash light test last night. I don't know what came over me. These are lenses that have consistently produced good results for me. Glass that is clean....except for the usual internal dust.
Why I did this, I cannot say. I feel as if some demon possessed my being for a few minutes and compelled me to this tragic error.
Save yourself!
Keep that dammed flashlight away from the optics with which you are well pleased.
I am lost! What is the flash light test?
Don't ask, lest you be tempted to do it.
You shine a small flashlight through the lens to look for haze, internal dust, fungus or whatever. It highlights whatever flaws are there better than just looking through it without the light.
Most lenses will show up something, most somethings you might see don't have any real effect, especially various specs of dust, or small bubbles or similar imperfections in the glass. But it all looks scary. It's a good way to bargain down the on the price of a lens you might be buying.
I’ll never forget the first time I did that... scarred me for life. I’ve never touched a shutter speed tester because I know I couldn’t handle that!
I’ll never forget the first time I did that... scarred me for life. I’ve never touched a shutter speed tester because I know I couldn’t handle that!
don't fix or test what ain;t broken.I made the mistake of submitting a few of my "known good" lenses to the flash light test last night. I don't know what came over me. These are lenses that have consistently produced good results for me. Glass that is clean....except for the usual internal dust.
Oh, The Horror!
What compelled me to this tragic error, I cannot say.
Save yourself!
Keep that dammed flashlight away from the optics with which you are well pleased.
I always used a 60W bulb for the purpose, but I suppose it doesn't matter. But if a lens can't pass the test, and my standards are indeed very strict, the lens doesn't go on my camera. i either open it up for cleaning, or scrap it if there are scratches or etching.
"Pops" Whitesell, who had a studio in the "French Quarter" of New Orleans, preferred allowing spider-webs to exist inside his lenses to a clean, razor-sharp lens. Used a Packard shutter also. I think he became a Fellow of the Photographic Society of America for his work, even after F64 was organized in California. Later, after losing a leg to diabetes, he still made pictures as well as traveled, lectureng to professionals and advanced amateurs. Could it be that too much weight is being given to the value of "ultra-sharp" lenses in the making of "creative" photographs? I wonder. I have even heard of Hasselblad/Zeiss lenses criticized as being to "too sharp". Mine are NOT for sale......Regards!I have an old Petzval with a big chip near the center of the rear element. The photos it takes look great.
Since experiencing that, dust doesn't bother me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?