I don't measure out the next chemical until the film is in the current chemical.
But I do line up the bottles before starting.
I shot an entire roll in an OM-2 with the film loaded but not engaged with the sprockets. Did not notice that every time I wound on, the rewind knob was not turning.
Pretty sure everyone who has ever shot 35mm has done that at least once.
Um... the OM2 is a SLR.
Oh wait.. LOL. @Donald Qualls was referring to you not having the film engaged. I don't know why, but I was responding and thinking that he had mentioned having the lens cap on.
Look... it's early, and I've only had one cup of coffee. LOL
I've done the RF lens cap thing. Fortunately no one was looking.
Is your camera an older model - that doesn't indicate whether or not it's loaded?Since we're fessing up, last year I shot a whole roll of 36 exposures... with no film in the camera. Doh!
Carry a notebook and a pen. Jot down everything. As I have done (off and on) since 1963.
Is your camera an older model - that doesn't indicate whether or not it's loaded?
How would you develop Tmax and TriX simultaneously in the same tank?...the developing times are not the same!Well I thought I loaded the 35mm roll the other day when I loaded the tmax and TriX in the same tank. I’m just getting around to developing them today and it’s been in the same place on the table so I thought it was loaded. But nope... there the 35mm roll sits, right where it was when is WASNT loaded.
Carry a notebook and a pen. Jot down everything.
Could I buy your 60’s and 70’s notebooks from you? I bet they are full of useful information!
How would you develop Tmax and TriX simultaneously in the same tank?...the developing times are not the same!
That was my goal last year. I logged exposure data for five rolls before I gave up. I would try to store the changes in settings in my head, then forget what I had done! When I venture forth again for purposeful film photography, I will carry the notebook, and try again.
I looked up Ilfosol and discovered that indeed the recommended developing times for Tmax400 and for TriX are different by 1:30...which works if you underrate the speed of TriX at EI200, or pull development for +1EV (overexposed) TriX for the 1+9 dilution. At the 1+14 dilution, the 2:00 time difference as a percentage difference in times is not so great as at 1+9 dilution, so I guess you can get away with treating the film in that manner.Depends on the developer you are using.
B&W development can be very flexible.
For example if I had both films in the one tank and I was using Ilfosol 3 at 1+14 @20C then I would give both 12 mins.
I have done it before and to be honest, I couldn't see any difference (to my eye) than if I had developed them separately with separate times.
But I bet those images are firmly etched in your mind. Probably the best pictures you ever took.Things happen sometimes... I met Buena Vista Social Club band members in Barcelona 20 years ago, and we had a great time two hours before a concert, and they allowed me to photograph them freely: relaxed people... I did nearly a whole 36 frames roll, all Musicians smiling and playing their instruments, getting ready for the show... Unforgettable. I had seen them live recently, a few days before, so I just went home to develop while they were about to start... In front of my door, looking for the keys, I found my roll was yet in my coat pocket: I never put it inside my camera.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?