I just printed one last night and have not had time to scan it in, but in the image there are 3 elements going on and as I was watching it in the developer I had a similar thought of why am I so into taking pictures of strangers and what am I trying to do here. The image had a beautiful woman looking at the camera making eye contact, a crotchety-looking old man mid stride and a beggar in front of a fashion store with a sign that said something like "I'm not kidding". It resonates with me because it's a combination of things, coinciding in that one moment, then frozen on film.
Street photography feels to me like photographing those random, cinematic moments that happen as you walk down the street. Where you'd look to a friend and go -- did you see that? That can be with juxtaposition, lighting, expressions, action, movement, repetition -- whatever it is it's about that one split second. That's what makes it fun. There's no arrangement and no time to think. It's photography on instinct. It's communicating that moment or story with meaning in the final print.
Out of the thousands of frames I've shot on the street this year there have only been 5 to 10 that I actually like and feel have a story to tell. Out of the thousands of frames I've shot of studio portraits or landscapes I can say about half are printable, good work for those genres, but none carry quite the meaning of one solid street photograph -- for me.
I'm on a roll
This is fascinating! To me, it is the exact opposite. Any more input on this?Your image would have been dismissed if it was my shot, solely on the basis that the foot of the lady behind the dog is overlapsed by the dog. Yes, I am a perfectionist to that degree. The image can be meaningful in many regards but it has to be technically perfect at first sight. It's all about the balance.
These are all quite good. Damn good actually.I'm on a roll
These are very good. Have you put them in the gallery?I'm on a roll
These are all quite good. Damn good actually.
These are very good. Have you put them in the gallery?
They are great.I'm on a roll
I don't entirely agree with this. I started to elaborate last night, but missed some of your later posts (and your excellent images). Technicals can take a hit if there's something interesting (and I mean really interesting) going on. A little motion blur in a picture of a college girl throwing up on a homeless man? Who cares! But then again, I'm a Mark Cohen fan. I see what you mean about the dog/leg connection, but it's a non-issue for me because (sorry OP) there's just nothing terribly interesting going on there. In those critical first three seconds, it's not a tack sharp or perfectly harmonious composition that's going to hold the average viewer.Your image would have been dismissed if it was my shot, solely on the basis that the foot of the lady behind the dog is overlapsed by the dog. Yes, I am a perfectionist to that degree. The image can be meaningful in many regards but it has to be technically perfect at first sight. It's all about the balance.
Very good shots, you clearly have an eye and understand street photography isn't just photographs taken on the street.I'm on a roll
Thanks, very thin negative, my skill level isnt up to doing a good print yet, but I will.Love this image.
This is true!!I see what you mean about the dog/leg connection, but it's a non-issue for me because (sorry OP) there's just nothing terribly interesting going on there. In those critical first three seconds, it's not a tack sharp or perfectly harmonious composition that's going to hold the average viewer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?