I agree that "street photography" in these youtube, insta, etc days is getting about as tired as decrepit barns and old cars. I stand firmly in the photographing old stuff camp, so criticize all you like.
If you (or any photographer) can establish some type of rapport with your intended subject/group, you would likely be able to photograph them with anything from a Minox to the homemade 20x24 wet-plate monster you just built.
I did a bit of walking around in Seattle last weekend. camera (Mamiya 6mf) out of bag and in hand 90% of the time. I did get some random folks in a few wide-angle frames, but they were not the main subject of the scenes, and not a single person asked about the camera or what/who I was photographing. Without quitting my job and embarking upon a bunch of research and establishing a connection with an individual or maybe a single family who is/are living outdoors, any random portraits of said folks is edging very close to exploitation and serves no purpose in my mind. As to the "average" folks who were downtown; shoppers, runners, tourists, employees on breaks, etc. I didn't see the need to interrupt their day.
I am curious regarding the OP's use of AI in these searches, and I wonder how far and wide the data is gathered from? Is it taking into account comments from video watchers? Think of the discourse that is begun once a "popular" youtuber does a review or a "Barcelona with Portra and an RB67" video. Or "I discovered a "new" camera." Photographer then presents a Speed Graphic.
Think of what it takes us to access something on the internet archive. does an AI enabled search scan all of that stuff? I am intrigued and a bit frightened, but AI is not the focus of this thread.