Per, I sent a pm and hope to be one of the 12 present and ready to learn this coming February.
Best,
Curt
I thought you meant you were doing carbon over platinum or platinum over carbon
I thought you meant you were doing carbon over platinum or platinum over carbon
Email sent. I'm lacking 8 x 10 negs for contact printing as I'm only up to Medium Format right now. Would love to join this workshop but need to get my hands on a few negs for contact printing. Anyone interested in lending some or <gasp> selling some to me?
Not to worry about negatives. I am going to bring some of my 8x10 negatives for those that need to use them so they can learn the process. For my carbon printing workshop 8x10 would be ideal and 5x7 or 4x5 are okay. Those with digital negatives are okay also. This workshop will give you the fundamentals of the process and show you the potential of carbon transfer. Once you get some hands on with this process and understand the mechanics then the real fun begins. We need to walk before we can run.
Jim
Yes, thanks for sharing this Jim! I'm on board! Per sent me back a message earlier today and said to bring my medium format negs and appropriate digital negs could be made for purposes of instruction. To be honest I don't really care which negs I'd be using, getting hands on instruction from masters and so nearby (I'm in San Luis Obispo) is just awesome. Either way I'll bring what I have and maybe I've got some good candidates already. For the record though, what constitutes a better negative for carbon printing? Would it be the more contrasting ones?
For the purpose of carbon transfer and the way I work I try to go for a more contrasty negative. I think an important part of learning carbon transfer is seeing the negative and the resulting print. Contrasty negatives with textured areas work best in my opinion, but I have been able to produce very nice prints with negatives of low contrast. I do develop my negatives in Pyro but if you are using non Pyro developers that is fine. More contrast is better with traditional negatives. One would develop about 20% more or greater depending on the scene. A negative with a DR of 1.8-2.2 is a nice range for traditional negatives. If you are in the SLO area I hope you have checked out the Los Osos Oaks preserve. Some great Oaks in there and I will have some prints from that area to show.
Jim
I've been doing some online searching too and have a folder "Carbon Transfer" in my favorites. I was reading about the two types, single and double transfer, it appears that single can be less sharp because the negative has to be placed in contact with the emulsion side out as to have the image correctly orientated. Double transfer eliminates this? The light source, bulb type, has an overall effect on the final print also. Would you suggest a book to read prior to the workshop?
Curt
I've been doing some online searching too and have a folder "Carbon Transfer" in my favorites. I was reading about the two types, single and double transfer, it appears that single can be less sharp because the negative has to be placed in contact with the emulsion side out as to have the image correctly orientated. Double transfer eliminates this? The light source, bulb type, has an overall effect on the final print also. Would you suggest a book to read prior to the workshop?
Curt
Single transfer is considerably less complicated than double transfer, and relief effect is also a lot more enhanced with single transfer. These days many people print carbon with digital negatives, and we just flip the image file so that the orientation is correct.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?