• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

The Art Group - Insolvency Act 1986???

bill schwab

Advertiser
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
3,751
Location
Meeshagin
Format
Multi Format
The Art Group based in London has repped my work in the printed matter(posters, notecards, etc.) field for some time now. And although a not a big part of my business, it was still nice to get that royalty check in the mail twice a year. Contact has always been good with them and they've always treated me well.

Sad to report that I've been surprised at receiving what I thought was the mid-year royalty, but turned out to be a cryptic form with no cover letter with a notice of "Insolvency Act 1986". It gives no other information whatsoever. I am assuming this is like the US version of bankruptcy, but still left wondering about some issues. Any help from an APUG member from the UK that is in the know would be appreciated.

I know there are many others out there that have worked with them and some quite a bit. It is a shame that better notice wasn't given as it must be quite a blow to those that do a lot of business with them.
 
I've just received the same letter Bill ! I only had one image published with them which was a colour transparency and which they still have in their possesion. Came as a bit of a shock to me aswell, they were a very big and well established operation, I thought.
Dont really understand the finer details of insolvency vs bankruptcy vs liquidation etc so cant shed any more light on it.

Bill
 
Thanks Bill. Sorry to hear you got stung as well. I only had 6 images with them, but they sold a lot of them consistantly. Too bad. Fortunately they had no originals. Hope you get your tranny back!
 
I received the same letter a week ago. I have emailed several people there asking about royalties and what happens to existing posters, I have not heard back from any one yet. Do they dump the posters, sell them to another publisher,etc? Given that these are copyrighted materials and that royalties are due for any posters that get sold I would think that a new publisher/distributor would have to honor any existing contracts.
 
A friend sent this link... go to page 16 if it doesn't link directly.

http://www.gazettes-online.co.uk/ViewPDF.aspx?pdf=58782&geotype=London&gpn=11536&type=Issue

I'm doubting that any outstanding balances will be paid. If anything, it will be pennies on the dollar. I've had several magazines go belly-up while owing me money and work and I never saw a dime OR the work again. I was with Picture Group agency many years ago and they too went under. I never saw any of those transparencies again and was never paid what was owed to me. Everyone simply evaporated. Looking like a write-off to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insolvency means that a firm of administrators can be appoint to run the company, and see if there's any way of re-structuring &re-financing the company. It generally means that a company can often be saved, rather than going bankrupt, and liquidators called in to sell of it's assets to pay outstanding debts. You just call this something different in the US.

Ian
 
Ian Grant said:
You just call this something different in the US.
Click to expand...
Chapter 11, I believe. It looks as though the reorganization name for this one is "The Artful Group". How imaginative.

So, so happy I did not have more with them and my condolences to those that do/did.
 
I'm no insolvency expert but from what I have seen my take on this is that they are reforming the company under a new (Artful Group) name and apparently have permission from the court or administrator to do so. I would think that if they plan on continuing to license artist's work for publication that it is not in their best interests to piss off all the artists that they were already doing business with. So we'll see if the reformed company lives up to it's previous legal commitments to those that supplied the copyrighted intellectual properties.

The use of the images was not a sale of property but a licensing of intellectual property and that license may not be transferable to the reformed company. Here's a link to a site that talks about these issues in regards to US law:
http://bankruptcy.cooley.com/2007/0...les-the-importance-of-protecting-your-rights/
 
Maybe that was a bit too subtle. The character known as "The Artful Dodger" is a pickpocket in Dickens' Oliver Twist. Not exactly the association I'd think a company undergoing reorganization would want, I'd think, but it's surely intentional.
 
Alas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register