Huss
Member
I had just loaded the 5th roll of film in my Kodak, when I decided to take it out and shoot it in the Agat instead.
I wanted to refresh my memory on how the Agat handles C200, because the pics I dug up shows the Agat really has a special lens.
While the Kodak is sharp in the middle, it gets smeary to the edges. The Agat's lens just flat out rocks - also helped by the fact that it can be focused.
So is the Agat "better"? Not if you just want a very simple easy to handle camera that makes good pics and is easy to use. The Agat can make sharper pics, and you can adjust the exposure (and focus) but those virtues make it less care-free and much harder for someone inexperienced/no experience to use. For the novice who just wants to shoot film, the Kodak is the choice. It also has a clearer VF that is naturally set in portrait mode. The Agat if held as designed, will create images in the landscape mode.
But man does the Agat have a remarkably good lens!
I wanted to refresh my memory on how the Agat handles C200, because the pics I dug up shows the Agat really has a special lens.
While the Kodak is sharp in the middle, it gets smeary to the edges. The Agat's lens just flat out rocks - also helped by the fact that it can be focused.

So is the Agat "better"? Not if you just want a very simple easy to handle camera that makes good pics and is easy to use. The Agat can make sharper pics, and you can adjust the exposure (and focus) but those virtues make it less care-free and much harder for someone inexperienced/no experience to use. For the novice who just wants to shoot film, the Kodak is the choice. It also has a clearer VF that is naturally set in portrait mode. The Agat if held as designed, will create images in the landscape mode.
But man does the Agat have a remarkably good lens!