Tetenal C41 developing question

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 5
  • 6
  • 68
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 81
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 6
  • 4
  • 120
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 131

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,046
Messages
2,785,339
Members
99,790
Latest member
EBlz568
Recent bookmarks
1

Tmea

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
4
Format
Medium Format
Greetings,

im new to the forum (incredible resource) and new to developing color at home. I'm looking for some observations or advice on using the Tetenol C41 kit. I bought the powder based kit, mixed the chemicals and went at it. First two rolls came out very well now I'm getting negatives that are very dark and lack contrast. I've processed six rolls of 24 exp 35 mm.

I think I've kept the significant variables in check so far. Temperatures are right ago 102, chemicals are stored in collapsing bottles with no air gap. Rinse funnel and measuring cup to reduce cross contamination, followed the directions and times etc.. I cannot identify where the problem may be. The chemistry is about two weeks old.

The only thing that comes to mind is one of timing and developer deterioration. The instructions call for 3:30 developing time across the life of the kit (12 rolls of 35mm). It occurs to me that with each use the developer loses some of its effectivness and thereby should require a corresponding addition to the enveloping time beyond 3:30. There is nothing in the instructions that address this, nor have I found anything else on the net. I'm out of answers.

would appreciate any shared wisdom or recommendations you may have

thanks!

Tom
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,391
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Welcome to APUG

How much time between the first two rolls and the next six?
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
Welcome to APUG

"chemicals are stored in collapsing bottles with no air gap" Note! These bottles are suspect. I use to use them myself however, the type of plastic used doesn't stop air from infiltrating the bottle. May or may not be your problem. JMHO
 

wildbill

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
2,828
Location
Grand Rapids
Format
Multi Format
First off, you'll need to spell tetenal correctly for an effective search. Search "re-use c41" or re-use tetenal c41
Lots of info on the web about this.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Dark negatives with low contrast sound like your bleach and fix or blix have gone bad or have been used up.

PE
 

mablo

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
385
Format
Multi Format
I add 15 seconds on top of the developing time for every 4th or 5th roll. It's not anything scientific. I simply try to keep a somewhat standard contrast level as the developer gradually becomes weaker.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
See the Kodak chart on C41 with the increases in time needed to develop more than one film. If you overdo it, you might be fogging the film.

PE
 

bvy

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,285
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
This seems to be coming up a lot lately. Persoanlly I think it's hard to troubleshoot C-41 developing problems when you're reusing the developer. Everytime you open that bottle and start dumping it here and there, you're introducing all kinds of variables and potential problems. In general, I think it's fine to re-use the developer, but for trying to diagnose problems, you could be chasing your tail.
 

Lamar

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
375
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
35mm
Do a two minute rinse (fill and drain multiple times preferably) after the developer. It's not in the instructions but it helps with x-contamination. I usually do about 8 to 10 rolls before I call it quits for a batch but I have done more if the chem's shelf life doesn't catch me. I've stretched it to 4 weeks before tossing it though and still got decent results, in my experience things get a bit questionable after that. For storage I just use old 1 liter drink bottles and have had no problem with any accelerated degradation...... but every time I look at my pictures I want a Coke....

Disclaimer: I scan only so I figure that can hide a multitude of sins. You mileage may vary significantly if you're printing optically.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,081
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
First two rolls came out very well now I'm getting negatives that are very dark and lack contrast.

How did you come to the conclusion that your negs have low contrast? Is this just your impression from looking at the negs, or did you try an optical test print which came out flat? Note that retained silver will reduce color saturation, but not contrast, because silver builds up in the same areas where dye clouds form. Also, in my experience every fogged negative looks low in contrast regardless of its actual contrast.

I'd say take a test clip of your neg and try to rebleach it, either with some fresh BLIX, or mix yourself a quick batch of Farmer's reducer. If density doesn't go down, your developer was too active. I know that p-Phenylenediamine and its derivatives (e.g. CD-4) go up in pH over time, and as a result developer activity (and fog) goes up.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom