Ian Grant
Subscriber
Today I sat and recorded the shutter speeds of 3 lenses with quite different shutters.
I was surprised how accurate a program like Audacity is for these these test. (I also have Sound Forge which is better but not Free).
Mainly I've always used LF lenses at speeds of a 1/30th and lower, and my audio tests are remarkably accurate. I was quite surprised.
I've always thought Copal's are lazy shutters and the first to need attention, and have found all my Compurs are far more reliable even the 90 yera old on a 165mm Tessar
Here's a Copal starting at a second
A 1932 surprisingly accurate Compur
and a beast of an Acme 3
All shutters except the Copal run through all speed up to a 1/200th
The point is use Audacity or similar & read the speed off the timeline, it's free you have a PC or you wouldn't be reading this
All the LF lenses I have with me in Turkey (9) fall well between the examples and the shutters are accurate
Ian
I was surprised how accurate a program like Audacity is for these these test. (I also have Sound Forge which is better but not Free).
Mainly I've always used LF lenses at speeds of a 1/30th and lower, and my audio tests are remarkably accurate. I was quite surprised.
I've always thought Copal's are lazy shutters and the first to need attention, and have found all my Compurs are far more reliable even the 90 yera old on a 165mm Tessar

Here's a Copal starting at a second

A 1932 surprisingly accurate Compur
and a beast of an Acme 3

All shutters except the Copal run through all speed up to a 1/200th

The point is use Audacity or similar & read the speed off the timeline, it's free you have a PC or you wouldn't be reading this

All the LF lenses I have with me in Turkey (9) fall well between the examples and the shutters are accurate
Ian
Last edited by a moderator: