Tele-Arton 5.6/250 - surprisingly good! :)

eumenius

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
768
Location
Moscow, Russ
Format
Medium Format
Hello friends,

yesterday I've tightened my belt and finally bought a beautiful Tele-Arton 250/5.6, Linhof selected. $250, glass flawless, the plastic handle on release lever is lost (usual issue with Compurs). Well, I tried the lens on infinity - no movements on 4*5, almost. But I wanted it for the portraits, and that's where the lens really shines - it's very easy to focus (on great SatinSnow glass, of course), and there's a full sharpness beginning from the full aperture! But the most nice thing about this lens is a good crisp sharpness together with an unusually long tonal range of resulting negatives - it's not a lack of contrast, it's an excellent plus rendition of skin tones. My Fujinon-W 210/5.6 works way much harsher. The only lens I have I can compare with this Tele-Arton - an old barrel-mounted Trioplan 210/3.5, but it's not as sharp as the relatively modern T-A (not as if I needed that from Trioplan, though ). So it looks that I've got a perfect portrait lens for my LF work - with exactly the characteristics I wanted And it's in Compur 1, a very convenient feature. And the bellows draw on my Toyo-View 45D allows me to choose whatever scale of portrait I want, no limits in reasonable boundaries

Thanks to everybody whom I eventually misled with the lens type in my previous post, and who gave me their opinion on T-As - I've had a chance already to see 240/5.5 Tele-Arton, and it's just incomparable with my lens I would scan the prints tomorrow, and post them in my gallery - just to show how everything works

Cheers,
Zhenya
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
2,360
Location
East Kent, U
Format
Medium Format
Why be surprised? I have a 360/5.5 Tele-Arton and it's one of my favorite lenses, really good definition and very good flare supression (flare is very low). Just shows what you can do with 4 elements and single coating!
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I used to have a 360/5.5 Tele-Arton as well, and it was quite a good lens on 4x5". It was also in an aluminum barrel (but still a Copal 3), so it was fairly light for a big lens.
 
OP
OP

eumenius

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
768
Location
Moscow, Russ
Format
Medium Format
Um, I was just a bit worried about these negative opinions about those old Tele-Artons from f/5.5 series. No good coverage, vignetting, no contrast etc. But when I've seen my 250/5.6, I thought "Such a charming thing, obviously multicoated, just can't be all this bad"

What's really bad, that's my scanner - I promise to post the pictures ASAP, the damned machine won't work

Cheers, Zhenya
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
The 360 Tele-Arton that I had was definitely better than my 360 Tele-Xenar, but I sold the Tele-Arton, because the Tele-Xenar is cammed for my Tech V, and since the maximum shutter speed is 1/100 (max for the Tele-Arton was 1/125), I tend to use it stopped down anyway.
 
OP
OP

eumenius

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
768
Location
Moscow, Russ
Format
Medium Format
And on my Compur 1 the maximum speed is 1/500 - maybe for shooting some car races with 4x5?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…