Technical question: E6 in C41.

Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 74
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 61
High st

A
High st

  • 10
  • 0
  • 91

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,228
Messages
2,788,201
Members
99,836
Latest member
Candler_Park
Recent bookmarks
0

fotoobscura

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
250
Location
NOLA
Format
Medium Format
Evening.

Having a few rolls of E6 left that I didn't feel like spending $10/each to develop, and knowing that whatever was on them didn't mean much, I went ahead and developed two rolls of Velvia 50 and Elitechrome 160T in C41 chemistry.

They came out pretty well and I forgetting that this was E6 and not C41 (e.g. I should have done this one shot), I poured the used chemistry back into the bottles (dev and blix) and essentially contaminated the existing c41 chemistry.

The next day I developed a roll of Superia 800 (C41) in the same chemistry and all came out well.

Then, a few weeks later, I went to develop two rolls, both C41, and they were completely cleared.

It took me a few days of pondering before I figured it must have been the E6 film in the C41 chemistry that caused it to clear.

So the question is for someone technical: what happened chemically in this longer period of time to cause what appears to be a complete breakdown of the developer? I can only assume the blix cleared the roll completely because the developer wasn't acting at all.

Thanks in advance!
 

OzJohn

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Messages
302
Format
35mm
Not sure why you'd pose this question on a digital/hybrid forum - most of the photo chemists who could most likely help you post on APUG and don't seem to visit DPUG. Cross processing of E6 film in C41 used to be commonplace and most most labs did it using the same chemistry line as they used for straight C41 so I'm not sure that cross-contamination is the problem. OzJohn
 
OP
OP
fotoobscura

fotoobscura

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
250
Location
NOLA
Format
Medium Format
I posted this on APUG in the Color: Film, Paper, and Chemistry sub-forum.
 

heterolysis

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
173
Location
Hamilton
Format
Multi Format
I've heard E6 can ruin C41. Most labs will run cross processing at the end of the day before they dump the chemicals. So I'm told.

It's likely your chemistry was fine after cross processing, but that whatever is in the E6 catalyzed some sort of decomposition of your developer (oxidation?) and that after being left a while it got to the point it was no good anymore. That would be my guess, but I don't know a thing about E6 chemistry so hopefully someone else can come along and shed a little light on it for us.
 

Simonh82

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
251
Location
London, Unit
Format
Multi Format
It wasn't the E6 that ruined the film. I've had both Tetenal and Rollei chemistry last for months after putting E6 film through. It sounds more like you've mixed up your dev and blix.

Most commercial labs operate a replenishment system so the chemistry is rarely dumped.

It just isn't going to cause this kind of problem, nor does C41 developer just die like that.
 
OP
OP
fotoobscura

fotoobscura

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
250
Location
NOLA
Format
Medium Format
Simon,

Thanks. Fair enough. That was my other thought and it makes sense considering reusing C41 chemistry after developing E6 film gets much darker (especially the dev).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom