Mitya138
Allowing Ads
Thanks, but what's a "CN line"? I'm going to have to translate it into Japanese for the local boys to understand.
Thanks, but what's a "CN line"?
The best results are still obtained with Technidol. QUOTE]
I have never understood the meaning of the word "best" - especially in this case..
I have developed TechPan in many years, and my all time favourite developer is Tetenal Neofin Doku (now discontinued as well, alas).
I use the TechPan for protraits mainly and here the Neofin Doku gives me all the sharpness/greytones I need - and more..
(I expose it at 100iso - pre-rinse and then develop for about 6 min)
I have found Neofin doku on #bay several times, so now I have the amount of developer I need for my remaining films..
Edit: did a search: here it is.. BOTH types...
http://shop.ebay.de/?_from=R40&_trksid=p5197.m570.l1313&_nkw=neofin+doku&_sacat=See-All-Categories
There was a procedure published for Rodinal by a photographer in Photo Techniques magazine just before the Athens Olympics. Worked fine for meI recently developed a roll of Tech Pan in Rodinal 1+100 9 minutes. Came out just fine. Three turns a minute.
Nicholas Lindan;1143659 The best results are still obtained with Technidol. said:I have never understood the meaning of the word "best" - especially in this case..
Best results == the results I like. Since, of course, I have consummate taste my judgment on this matter can be considered absolute - insert smiley as needed. [Does this really require explanation? De gustibus non est disputandum and all that.]
My criteria is the closer a print from a 35mm Techpan negative comes to looking like a contact print from a large format negative the better.
Other people, of course, have other criteria and prefer a different look.
I am sure your criteria and aesthetics are very different from mine.
Best results == the results I like. Since, of course, I have consummate taste my judgment on this matter can be considered absolute - insert smiley as needed. [Does this really require explanation? De gustibus non est disputandum and all that.]
My criteria is the closer a print from a 35mm Techpan negative comes to looking like a contact print from a large format negative the better.
Other people, of course, have other criteria and prefer a different look.
I am sure your criteria and aesthetics are very different from mine.
a smiley would be nice..
However the last sentence was what I lacked.:
"My criteria is the closer a print from a 35mm Techpan negative comes to looking like a contact print from a large format negative the better"...
Me too!! and I can't seem to get this with technidol, but easily with neofin doku...
I don't think the NeofinDoku is widely known in the states (?) - I "never" see anything for sale on #bay..
It is a german product, and it pops up frequently on German #bay...
And I have actually never seen anybody (inhere or elsewhere) that "admits" to using NeofinDoku - so maybe I am just a sole ignorant.
Suggestion though: If you can, then buy some NeofinDoku and try it out.(?)
"D 76 Developer 9:10"
D76 1:1?
Thanks.
The images are great. Anyone has MSDS for Tetenal Neofin doku? I googled and cannot find it other than the Neofin Blue MSDS:
Metol ........................... < 1%
Hydroquinone ................ < 1%
Potassium carbonate ...... 5 - 10%
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?