Tamron 17mm f3.5 - Is This Lens Separation?

Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 3
  • 0
  • 60
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 79
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 3
  • 0
  • 57
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 3
  • 0
  • 55
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 3
  • 2
  • 102

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,837
Messages
2,781,625
Members
99,722
Latest member
Backfocus
Recent bookmarks
0

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
I bought this online and wondering if this is lens separation or something else? I've been refunded in full, so no issues there, but I'm curious if it's repairable as they aren't cheap to come by these days, and if the cost to repair was better than buying another, I might go that route.

Otherwise, saving my pennies will be the only way to go and I'll display it in my "Camera Cabinet" or use it as a paperweight. :D

Tamron_17mm_f3.5.JPG
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,939
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Looks like separation to me.
I would use it - just keep away from high flare situations.
It may also show some reduced resolution at the edges of the frame, or maybe it won't?
You may only see bad effects at larger apertures.
Can you live with a 17mm f/5.6 lens?
 

beemermark

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
869
Format
4x5 Format
Take pictures with it and stop examining it under a microscope. The 17mm is one of the best lenses Tamron made and you'll never see any issues with it.
 
OP
OP
ozphoto

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Take pictures with it and stop examining it under a microscope. The 17mm is one of the best lenses Tamron made and you'll never see any issues with it.

I've shot with one of these previously - Tamron's have always been a staple in my kit, but noticed immediately with this one, that the centre has a definite "hotspot" in sunlight, hence the question. Stopping down helps, but if I was needing the extra stops, the shots would be pretty woeful - the hotspot is as obvious as big, pink spots on a hippo. :D

Compared to the shots taken on a Tokina 17mm I also owned for several years - the Tokina wins hands down as it wasn't showing any issues at all apertures; sure they're soft on the edges and have some funky vignetting, but this one, sadly, is definitely not giving the great performance that I've always associated with Tamron SP lenses.:cry:
 
OP
OP
ozphoto

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Looks like separation to me.
I would use it - just keep away from high flare situations.
It may also show some reduced resolution at the edges of the frame, or maybe it won't?
You may only see bad effects at larger apertures.
Can you live with a 17mm f/5.6 lens?

Matt, it has a very obvious hotspot when shooting wide open in sunlight (not just high flare situations).
Yes, it does improve as I stop down, but as I like shooting wide open it's not an ideal choice - guess I'll keep looking for a better example and in the meantime use it at f5.6.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom