(there was a url link here which no longer exists) is one of my first, an image taken on regular film (APX100), enlarged and printed onto Ultrafine Ortho/Litho film in the darkroom. This transparent positive is pretty high-contrast. I then used a "Solarplate", available from various dealers on the web. Mine came from Dan Weldon, but they are also available
Dead Link Removed
The other type of plate available at that site is the KM73 plate I have recently purchased and am now working on. The attached image below is from that brand of plate, purchased from
Boxcar press. This was exposed through a copy machine transparency made from a print. The tonal range of the final print is not what I hoped, but I'm still working on the best way to get continuous tone. I think it has to do with the stochastic screen I use after I expose the original image. I think this scan proves I've got a lot to learn.
For a look at what I'm
trying to do, check out this site by an artist named
Susan Voss[/QUOTE]
Hi,
You may find the KM73s more consistent than the Solarplates. I struggled with them 7 or 8 years ago and all of my problems disappeared when I changed to the KM73s. Solarplates are great if you work in a very loose way, but for a print with a full range of tones I'd stick with the KM73s. They also seem to be able to resolve and hold finer detail.
Where did you get the screen? Dan Weldon's aquatint screen works very well and I've stuck with his over the years. You may have to adjust your exposure ratios too. 50:50 isn't always the best combination, and in fact my screen exposures are currently much higher than my image exposure. A lot of variations!
Good luck.
Keith.