I found this fascinating list of different countries, and what is OK to take photos of whilst out in public, and what is not OK. Scrolling down gives you what I would term more information than anyone would ever need, but it might be pertinent if someone is traveling. Not sure how up to date this is, but it's better than nothing. The second link refers to taking photos of "identifiable people", a very lawyerly term that seems to mean.....people.
Texas and Kansas probably have their own ideas on this, but I try not to travel to far right wing de facto countries, so I won't be taking any snaps there.
Texas and Kansas probably have their own ideas on this, but I try not to travel to far right wing de facto countries, so I won't be taking any snaps there.
It's just like any other place: just don't be obnoxious and get up in anyone's face with your camera or have a hostile attitude and you'll be fine. It's also obvious that if you do single out someone and use their photo for commercial purposes, you should have a model release or contract.
Those lists give you the legal position but not the social one. For instance, taking photographs of people in the street is usually legal in the UK, but it is not wise to specifically photograph children without asking first.
Yeah. I don't like his style and consider him much more a nuisance than a photographer. He may be famous and have awards and recognition, but, these days, so does Kim Kardashian's butt.
Yeah. I don't like his style and consider him much more a nuisance than a photographer. He may be famous and have awards and recognition, but, these days, so does Kim Kardashian's butt.
Yeah. I don't like his style and consider him much more a nuisance than a photographer. He may be famous and have awards and recognition, but, these days, so does Kim Kardashian's butt.
Years back on photo.net there was a group of ***holes who did forum threads that they called "street photo slams" where the whole thread was just post after post of street photos most taken just like this, cameras, mostly with flash, shoved right in people's faces. Their comments matched their obnoxiousness too. (It was almost like those jerk college kids who take advantage of high school girls and are proud of their immature triumphs). If anyone questioned their ethics and style of in-your-face at any cost attitude they would shoot them down. One person suggested they used flash as a cowardly way of blinding the people so they could get away quicker. Ha. So accurate.
It was about then that I started visiting photo.net less and less and I was a member there from way back when it started...
In my trip to Greece this past summer, I took a lot of candid photos of the locals. That fact that that Athens was a very busy city distracted people and didn't even notice me shooting picture helped. And also the Leica and Rollei are virtually silent helped to. What I do now that I noticed that work is pretend to kneel down to tie your shoe next to a person you want to shoot, they pay no attention to you, then squeeze off a shot. Works every time.
This is unbelievable. To my mind this photographer has no respect of other peoples privacy. And I don't like when photographers take pictures of people beeing in need...like the guy falling down in the video. Everyone shold be kind to one another, right?!
This is unbelievable. To my mind this photographer has no respect of other peoples privacy. And I don't like when photographers take pictures of people beeing in need...like the guy falling down in the video. Everyone shold be kind to one another, right?!