Yes, in the $50+ range. I recommend you buy two because if you are on a trip and lose one spool, then you will have an unusable camera without the spare.Leica M2/3 spools come up fairly regularly on eBay for about $60-$80. I recently bought a spare one for my M2 for $65 with shipping.
Good luck, Paul
The quick load spool worked well, just wasn't really quicker than the removable spool -Yes, in the $50+ range. I recommend you buy two because if you are on a trip and lose one spool, then you will have an unusable camera without the spare.
Option: Leitz once sold a quick-load spool and guide, similar to the M4 spool. Some people claim the retrofit did not work well, but I never tried one.
Igor is awesome. I pissed him off once. We both got over it
Igor may or may not have it--or be able to find it. I once e-mailed him about an item that was listed for sale on his site, and his response was, basically, that he didn't know if he actually had it, that if he did he had no idea where it was, and that he really couldn't be bothered to look for it. So yeah, caveat potential emptor with Igor, let's say.
I recently bought a spare one for my M2 for $65 with shipping.
Good luck, Paul
I have no idea why someone would need a spare. I get that is possible to loose it, drop it in the gutter while changing film or something -- but would that justify a spare? Which parts of your equipment wouldn't need a spare then?Hi. Do one lose them or do they break eventually?
jan
have no idea why someone would need a spare. I get that is possible to loose it, drop it in the gutter while changing film or something -- but would that justify a spare? Which parts of your equipment wouldn't need a spare then?
The spool only comes out of the camera when you are loading film and they don't break unless you step on them.
Fair enough - you feel better to have a spare. But necessity related to photojournalism!! -- that is so 1950's!There are two reasons: one, you may indeed lose one. I remember reading an online account of someone who said they pulled theirs out while they were shooting on the street, it popped out of their fingers, and rolled directly over to a sewer drain and plunged in. So no more shooting for them until it was replaced. The other reason, and this is why I carry one, is (as I learned from some ancient photojournalists) when you are shooting in a hurry (say, during a protest that was becoming violent), you can load up a second roll on the extra spool and keep it in a handy location, and you can more quickly change film by just popping it in in place of the other spool (and keep better track of your surroundings vs. having to look down for several seconds to get the film tab under the flange on the spool). I've only shot that way a couple of times, honestly, but as I was able to get a spare spool for a relative pittance several years back, it wasn't a bad investment.
Fair enough - you feel better to have a spare. But necessity related to photojournalism!! -- that is so 1950's!
Fair enough - you feel better to have a spare. But necessity related to photojournalism!! -- that is so 1950's!
I found that very interesting. Who would have thought?!See, Huss provided another very valuable and valid reason for it!
It's nice to have a spare pre-loaded. Nothing to do with photojournalism. Shooting at the beach it allows you to load much quicker so your inners are not exposed to wind/sand etc so much.
I often ride a bike when I go out and take pics - it allows for less fiddling etc if you are balancing multiple items. Just makes a lot of sense.
Did you keep one of the double Adox film canisters to hold the spare?
How can you possibly loose a spool for an M2. It must be somewhere.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?