given the state of affairs in the film market, is there any realistic chance that Fuji would produce two different versions of a niche product like a ISO1600 film?
according to the data sheets for both films the specs (spectral response, characteristic curves, granularity ...) are 100% identical
In any case this film is excellent, one of my favorite color films, true ISO 1600, excellent in indoors lighting, and can enlarge to 8x10" without problems. Do OPTICAL enlargements; if you try to do it the d!gital way (by scanning), the grain will blow up horrible due to grain aliasing! I did a comparison about 10 years ago -- 8x10" done by the Frontier system (d!gital) versus the same frame enlarged optically; the difference in grain was dramatic.
given the state of affairs in the film market, is there any realistic chance that Fuji would produce two different versions of a niche product like a ISO1600 film?
according to the data sheets for both films the specs (spectral response, characteristic curves, granularity ...) are 100% identical
In any case this film is excellent, one of my favorite color films, true ISO 1600, excellent in indoors lighting, and can enlarge to 8x10" without problems. Do OPTICAL enlargements; if you try to do it the d!gital way (by scanning), the grain will blow up horrible due to grain aliasing! I did a comparison about 10 years ago -- 8x10" done by the Frontier system (d!gital) versus the same frame enlarged optically; the difference in grain was dramatic.
I think I can get RA4 paper easily here, but not the chemicals; it seems that stores only have their own supplies of the big-sized RA4 chemicals, the ones that work with replenishment fluids etc etc and suited to minilabs.
I've heard that RA4 paper development is easy and now i have a color enlarger, so it would be interesting to try.