Super-saturated Pt/Pd coatings

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
Not sure what you mean here, but I do know that the more pt/pd in the solution, the lower the contrast and better chance of fogging.
 
OP
OP

Ian Leake

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
1,626
Location
Switzerland
Format
Analog
Not sure what you mean here, but I do know that the more pt/pd in the solution, the lower the contrast and better chance of fogging.

Thanks. To clarify, super-saturated solutions are heated to high temperatures so that a greater load of iron and platinum/palladium can be deposited on the paper without increasing the water content of the coating. Sort of like double-coating but without the hassle of multiple applications. Intuitively this should increase the Dmax because there is greater density of platinum/palladium in the shadows. But as I said, I've not tried it so I'm hoping to find someone who has.
 

eclarke

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
1,950
Location
New Berlin,
Format
ULarge Format
Could be interesting. Sounds like time to try some 4x5 contact prints. How high does it need to be heated, do you think?
 
OP
OP

Ian Leake

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
1,626
Location
Switzerland
Format
Analog
Could be interesting. Sounds like time to try some 4x5 contact prints. How high does it need to be heated, do you think?

The simple answer is, "I have no idea". The thought experiment is straightforward though. B&S quote their Potassium Chloroplatinite as being a 20% solution, and this is fully dissolved at room temperature. By mixing Potassium Chloroplatinite powder into very hot water it should be possible to dissolve more than 20% w/v. I don't know how hot "very hot" is nor do I know how much more "more than 20%" is. The same approach should work for the other solutions in the mix.

The challenge I foresee is keeping everything hot enough to avoid crystallisation during coating, exposure and development. And of course the benefits, if any, could be outweighed by the difficulty and cost.
 

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
Intuitively is right, but in practice you will find it fogs and does not increase DMAX. This is because with the higher concentration of metal, it begins to reflect back light no matter the exposure, thus creating a base fog that has a slight shiny appearance, less contrast, and quite the drain on the wallet. I've seen this numerous times at B+S. If you want increased DMAX that is very apparent and real, try some fumed silica.
 
OP
OP

Ian Leake

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
1,626
Location
Switzerland
Format
Analog

Thanks - I guess that you've saved me a lot of hassle
 

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
Just trying to save you some money and frustration! Go ahead and experiment, but I also found this to be true when doing kallitypes, etc. Our theory is that more = less.

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

There's a write up on fumed silica. Using it in it's dry form makes it super easy to roll on and it has a dramatic effect on DMAX that makes PT/PD printers consider reprinting their entire portfolio!
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I've had much better luck applying the fumed silica wet rather than dry. I even went so far as to buy a cheap blender to mix it. But otherwise, my experience with it is on a par with what Mr. Klain says - it produces a notable boost to Dmax and overall contrast increase. And applying it wet doesn't add THAT much time to the coating process. I find it dries to a coatable surface within minutes.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,776
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format

What's your mixing ratio, if you don't mind my asking? Thanks.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,673
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format

I on the other hand find it much easier to coat dry. It is so easy to do that I now always use the silica even with my test strips. It takes so very little powder to brush on that the most common problem is from trying to put on too much. My first try wet produced streaks so that was the last I tried it. The dry method is too easy.
Dennis
 

cowanw

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
2,218
Location
Hamilton, On
Format
Large Format

How do you mix it? Quantities? Suggestions? I am thinking one could do up several sheets for future coating.
Thanks for your observations.
 

Klainmeister

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2010
Messages
1,504
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Format
Medium Format
Heh, funny. I tried it a few times wet and always ended up with streaks and stuck with dry after that. I don't even know a good base to being with.

Regarding archival quality: fumed silica is pure silica, which in effect, should have no, to little effect on the paper itself, nor the metals in the print. Granted, it's so new who really knows? We did do a trusty NM test where we tape a print to a door facing the southern sky, which here in NM is always sunny and at 7000', quite harsh. No fading or issues after a handful of days, which usually will destroy some of the older RC paper emulsions, etc. Not scientific, but confidence inspiring.
 

jakobb

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
16
Format
8x10 Format
In my search for better papers for Pd/Pt printing I also tried fumed alumia dry or wet applied. It gave better contrast and Dmax with several papers but bad mids and highlights (like too much restrainer). The fumed alumina suspended quite easily in Ethanol and that suspension has to be diluted with a lot of water (otherwise it soaks completely through the paper).
I am not so sure that more sensitizer increases Dmax. I investigated some prints under a stereo microscope and found often only the very top fibers get coated but in the mids it is apparent that some fibers get no or only very little Metal deposited. This explains the mottled mid tones. Papers like Buxton or Herschel have not that effect. I also investigated coated but not developed paper and found that different fibers within the paper surface have absorbed different amount of sensitizer. I have to make more of these studies but I think the goal is to get all the fibers absorb the sensitizer. Simply adding more will likely only act as a filter during exposure without contributing to image density.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…