Super friggin cool bellows factor compensator thingie.

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
There's a few of these around. Most are better than mine, but mine is distinctly super friggin cool. I stuck the link in my signature. Enjoy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

richard ide

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Wellington C
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Jason. Will be put to use tomorrow.
 

Steve Sherman

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Messages
548
Location
Connecticut
Format
ULarge Format
A different really super trick

You want to know how many stops to adjust for bellows factor?

Try this really super trick idea.

Take the lens you are using and convert it to inches, a 210mm lens is 8 1/4" if your bellows is racked out to 11 inches, you are basically at a one f-stop increase, ( convert the inches to f-stop numbers) f 8 to f 11 is one stop. Rack out to 16 in. and you are twice as long as lens, so you would be at 2 full f-stops. This would also be life size and I can't imagine having much need for any further magnification. It's all proportional, go down to a 6" lens racked out to about 8" and you would again have about a 1 f-stop increase in exposure. It is easy to calculate fractions of inches using 1/3's of f-stops.

For those who question if this method is precise enough, I used this method for years in table top photography using chrome film which demands much greater accuracy than does panchromatic films.


Cheers baby!
 

Jim Noel

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,261
Format
Large Format
I'm gvlad you think so much of the BF calculator. It is nothing new. I made one like it in the 1940's after reading an article in one of the mags of the time. Calumet sold one for many years, and may still do so.

Isn't it odd how old ideas come around and are "rediscovered" by a new worker.
 
OP
OP

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

Like I said, there's a few of these around. I've been using the Calumet version for years. It finally ratted up so bad I couldn't read it, so even calling it "rediscovered" would be a stretch, because I never lost it, but there are probably a quite few people new to LF that haven't seen one. I just made a super friggin cool new one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

rwyoung

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
708
Location
Lawrence, KS
Format
Multi Format
I just keep a tape measure and a cheap calculator in my bag. The tape measure has both inches and metric scales. Measure from apeture to film plane (D). Then compute D / focal lenght of lens and square it. That is your compensation factor. Relatively easy to convert from that to stops or adjust exposure time. Most of the time I don't even bother with the calculator, you can get this pretty close in your head after a few times.

Just remember to measure from the apeture, which is not necessarily the lensboard.

But you know what would be fun, offer the same thing without your fabulous mug, as a TIF or similar so that people can insert their own super friggin' cool image. Of course you should do a little branding so that with your fabulous mug it is the "deluxe" model...
 
OP
OP

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

Math make brain hurt. Solution: Keep brain wet.

Seriously, there are about 7 ways to do this. All I know is I never screw up with the BF calculator. However, whatever floats your boat. We all tend to work with what we are comfortable with, and for some reason it is usually the first way we learned how to do something. Steve's and your method was the second way I learned. I've never been much of a slide rule type of photographer. I try to keep that side of my brain as un-engaged as possible during photography.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I use a similar method, but without a target, so it works for small formats too. I just have a table with magnification factor and bellows factor taped to my meter and all my camera backs. I compare the width of the scene at the subject distance to the width of the format to determine the magnification factor, usually estimating, but if I'm unsure or if it's a still life, I might actually put a tape measure in the scene, like the target in Jason's thingie or the Calumet thingie or the thingie linked to the lfinfo.com page, and then I look up the magnification on the table to get the bellows factor.
 

Chuck_P

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
2,369
Location
Kentucky
Format
4x5 Format
I tried to open the link on your site Jason but when I do it locks my computer up, oh well.

This is not to tell you how to do it, but for LF beginners with rails like myself that may want to use this method: I just use the millimeter scale on my rail. When the inside to inside measurements of both standards are at 126mm apart, I know that my 210mm lens is at infinity. I simply made up a small chart with the extension factors at 1/2 inch increments forward of inifinity to about 5 inches. Did the math one time for the chart (just a few minutes). So, when the inside distance of the standards are, say,at 178mm, that's 2 inches forward of infinity, and my chart says 1.5x.
 
OP
OP

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

It's a pdf, so you may need acrobat reader. It opens ok on the two computers I have here, and a test across town. Computers.....

I'm certainly not telling anyone how to do it. (hehe we said "do it" hehe) You should do whatever works best for you. I haven't been able to try what you do, because all of my cameras are so old, they don't have any numbers on the rails. I could tape some on, but I haven't the heart. (or head)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

seawolf66

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
171
Location
outside bost
Format
Multi Format
J Brunner thanks yours is easyer to use than the Quick Disc by Phillip Salzgeber : Thanks
 

Thomas Bertilsson

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Jason, you are a good man. Saves me a lot of headache.
- Thomas
 

RobertP

Subscriber
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
1,190
Format
ULarge Format
I've had a quick disc in my wallet for years. It has been in there so long that it has made a 3" diameter circular impression into the leather. A few weeks ago I was checking out at the store and laid my wallet on the counter. The lady teller took one look at the wallet and looked at me and said " I'm impressed" After getting over the shock I started trying to explain but she was laughing so hard I just gave up.Time to buy a new wallet and go with the square disc.
 
OP
OP

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

That will be even more funny! She may never recover.
 

walter23

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
1,206
Location
Victoria BC
Format
4x5 Format
I saw a studio portraiture video wherein the photographer was using a sinar for some macro shots. He had a little doohickey from calumet that you put in the scene, then measure the size of on the ground glass. The size on the GG gives you a bellows factor from a lookup table.
 
OP
OP

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format

That sounds familiar. I think I've seen something like that somewhere.
 

argus

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,128
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for showing us, Jason.

Actually I like my current Quickdisc better, because you can also critically focus on it. With your version, that will be a bit more difficult, but maybe a hint for further improvement?

G
 

Nacio Jan Brown

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Messages
62
Location
Berkeley, CA
Quick Disc + CD or DVD

For easier focusing I scaled up the Quick Disc ruler on a copy machine to match the diameter of a CD. The bright silver is easy to see in any light. njb
 

cao

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
188
Format
35mm
Death match: Brunner vs. Calumet

JBrunner said:
That sounds familiar. I think I've seen something like that somewhere.
Click to expand...

Funny thing: in a fit of boredom, I derived the eqn for magnification from required change in aperture. When I measured, the Brunner thingy conforms within my error for measuring the reference square; the Calumet gadget that came with a used Cambo Legend is way off. What gives here? Not cool enough?
 

ZachInIsrael

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
34
Format
35mm
Thanks Jason, I downloaded it and watched your videos on youtube. I am about to work on some macro work with my sinar and this will be right handy.

I liked the developing videos too
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,354
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Good! Now I know what a doohickey is!

Sgteve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…