Thanks Jamesthey each have potential but need a lot of work. what do you see?
Thanks FredPaul... the first gives the impression of multi-directional light sources and is, in my opinion, not believable. The second... looks more credible... again the but, with the strongly lit window outline on the floor I would expect to see more gradations of tone adjacent to the bright outline as the light falls off across the floor. Well done for taking the challenge to expand your visualisation of the photographed scene!
Thank you very much Graham, you have given me plenty to think about, its always good to get others perspective. I like a challenge and will keep working at similar scenes till I can get it right......or a least get close.What does not work with the window projection, is the shadow of the sash in the middle of the window. It looks like it projects onto the wall for one thing, and unless there is a lot of dust or smoke in the air, the shadow will not appear in mid-air, only where the light hits something. Without that impossible diagonal shadow, it works well.
The other issue is what is revealing the light path, and how much scattering can occur against the far wall. Without dust to reveal the light path, you would get a bright area on the floor, and some general illumination on the walls. probably darker close to the window wall, brighter up to the end of the lit floor, then darkening deeper into the room. Dust scattering will lighten the light path, but not the background significantly. So the background remains stable and the light path has to be lightened - but you can't see though it very well. So the background is lost behind the bright scatter.
It is very hard to work out what is going on in a situation like this - the eye is fooled. Finding a real example, sketching it, then putting in light levels with a spot meter would tell you a lot. Or just judge the light levels looking through a hole in a piece of card. The card gives the eye a base reference, and the aperture reveals the actual light level.
I think you have picked a complex thing to try and emulate, but you are a lot closer than I would get!
Thats excellent Eddie. I generally have trouble containing bleach, forever going over the edges and it tends to pond, hard to get uniform streaks. Whats your process to achieve this effect? I switched from ferri and water to iodine, thio and metho seems to give me a little more control.Another way to add fake sunshine is with bleach. I used bleach to create the second one:
View attachment 201811 View attachment 201812
I generally have trouble containing bleach, forever going over the edges and it tends to pond, hard to get uniform streaks
What does not work with the window projection, is the shadow of the sash in the middle of the window. It looks like it projects onto the wall for one thing, and unless there is a lot of dust or smoke in the air, the shadow will not appear in mid-air, only where the light hits something. Without that impossible diagonal shadow, it works well.
Great to watch, she if very good and makes it look easy, but its the detail I need. Bleaching highlights is not too hard as long as you dont go too far, bleaching mids and shadows is a little more difficult.Paul, you may find this video link of assistance that is, if you have not watched it before... it is French but one can follow the story quite easily! Visit- you’ll see how this printer controls the bleaching process.
Thanks jnanian. I use hands a bit on larger prints, but they are too fat and clumsy for 8x10's. Great tip on using the contrast filters, I do do that sometimes, need to chose the right one else you get low contrast burns and high contrast dodges, then you still need to keep the rest of the picture at the right contrast.....its tricky.hi paul
you could also use a hard filter for the light
and a softer filter for the rest of the print.
that doesn't necessarily mean a 5+ or 5 but could
be something like a 4 or 4.5 and a 2 for the other exposure..
you can also use your filters as light you burn things in with instead
of the initial exposures. sometimes it is easier to expose your paper
for the stuff you want the "other" tones and then stick a contrast filter
in and stop your lens down a little and burn the print in that way...
not sure how you dodge and burn .. but i found it to be easier to use hands
instead of paper or cardboard cut outs or lollipops .. takes practice though.
good luck !
Thanks Ted. I do draw all over my test print my dodges, burns, base time, f stop, lens size etc also taught myself to fstop print, just need more practice.I like these. They show strong creativity at work to emphasize and manipulate dramatic lighting.
Dodging and burning gets easier with practice. If you don't already do so I recommend making careful notes about where dodging and burning were applied and in what amounts and include this for every print made, even tryouts. I write in 6B pencil on the back.
Think I need to observe more pictures, shadows do get caught in the dust, trying to look natural is hard.The more dust there will be, the less the shadow will show, if it would show at all, as it would be overcasted by stray light behind and in front of it.
But I must say I never faked such so far, and I even did not not realize that shadow in the air until you hinted at it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?