Suggestions on what Nikon lens to take.

It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 6
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 9
  • 3
  • 93
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 63

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,913
Messages
2,782,993
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
0

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
I’m heading to Arizona for Thanksgiving this year and have decided to take my
Nikon FT2 with a couple of lenses. One will be a 35mm lens with prong and the question is which of two 50mm lenses with meter prongs to take.
The first candidate is a F2 to F16 lens, serial starting with 328, the second is an F1.8 to F22, serial starting with 201.
I have not shot either lens in a very long time, if at all, and have forgotten which was the better, and I will not have time to test either lens what with work. Additionally I could add a Nikon 28-105mm AF lens but will have to deal with using a meter which would be ok. Thanks for any insights.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Take the F2 lens, Concentrate more on interesting images and composition than which lens you have or use. :smile:
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,695
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
The 28 to 105 had good range, but will be slower and you might to use a flash for indoor shots. Never had the F2, but all Nikon 50s are really good, not sure it will matter much.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
I like both of your 50mm Nikkor choices. Assuming they're both in good condition, it's really hard to go wrong with either.
Safe travels.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Plenty of sun in Az, so you can take the 28-105, which is a fine lens. Slow, but very good IQ, has a bit of pincushion at close distances, but you wouldn't see that unless you had some straight horizontal stuff at the edge of the frame.

I always liked the images from the 50mm F2 lenses, the 1.8 images were a little edgy, w/ busy bokeh.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,213
Location
Hawaii
Format
35mm RF
That 105mm is a good choice, and I'll add that also consider a 180mm ED with a light tripod and Maybe the TC-200/1. Surprisingly good quality maybe with a bit of stopping down and that area its nice to be able to have the extra reach and compression.
I brought a 300mm 2.8 to White Sands NM and I found I was enjoying the perspective and even more so with the TC-301 but your own tolerance may vary ha. But do consider a longer bit of glass, the long distance vistas can be compelling with good long(er) glass, and for the Nikkormat there are many low cost high quality choices.
 
OP
OP

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
I ran across this post after 9 months and wanted to correct some obvious (mistaken) choices on my behalf.
First off, I should have taken the longest zoom I had on hand. At least 90% of my shots ( if not all) could have been done with a 28-105. My 210mm zoom would have been preferable.
Second, 50mm and 35mm lenses are fine for large indoors areas, street shots, or buildings.
Third, I thought that I could get close to the petroglyphs, but nooooo, aint gonna happen what with railings keeping one back. Plus you cannot go off the trails, and everything is not close, and the glyphs are hard to see. Well,, try try again. At least I came away tho with some good shots tho..
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Sometimes the first visit to somewhere with a camera is largely experimentation... live and learn, as they say. I've always done better photographically on subsequent visits.

Pertroglyphs, and the like, are so protected these days that it is much better to buy a book or look at online images. Very sad but necessary due to the past history with destructive morons.
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,645
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
My suggestion based on having visited that area a couple of times is one wide and one tele. Two bodies if possible with the same film and each with one of the lenses. That way you don't have to change lenses or mistake a meter reading. A tripod of course. Concentrate on the beautiful scenery and the photography not the equipment.


 

Tomwlkr

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2023
Messages
87
Location
SE Coast of NC
Format
35mm
I ran across this post after 9 months and wanted to correct some obvious (mistaken) choices on my behalf.
First off, I should have taken the longest zoom I had on hand. At least 90% of my shots ( if not all) could have been done with a 28-105. My 210mm zoom would have been preferable.
Second, 50mm and 35mm lenses are fine for large indoors areas, street shots, or buildings.
Third, I thought that I could get close to the petroglyphs, but nooooo, aint gonna happen what with railings keeping one back. Plus you cannot go off the trails, and everything is not close, and the glyphs are hard to see. Well,, try try again. At least I came away tho with some good shots tho..

While in the Navy took a tour in France, took my 50 and a 135, really needed a 28 or 20, didn't matter, film was stolen before I got it developed
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
While in the Navy took a tour in France, took my 50 and a 135, really needed a 28 or 20, didn't matter, film was stolen before I got it developed


Welcome to APUG Photrio!!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom