• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Suggestions on shooting/processing "existing light" black and white?

Man in market place

A
Man in market place

  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
Abandoned Church

A
Abandoned Church

  • 2
  • 0
  • 30

Forum statistics

Threads
203,120
Messages
2,850,104
Members
101,680
Latest member
QGolden
Recent bookmarks
2

BradleyK

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
946
Location
Burnaby, BC
Format
Multi Format
In early August I am heading to Louisiana and Mississippi to spend a month shooting a mixture of architecture, landscape, documentary and street work (multi-format, of course). For most of my color work - both 35mm and 2 1/4 - I have decided on a mix (depending upon subject matter) of E100G and E100VS. Given that Ektachrome P800/1600 is no longer available, I have opted to use digital for any "existing light" color work I shoot. For black and white work, during normal daylight hours, I have opted for FP4 for 2 1/4 shooting and either HP5 or Tri-X for 35mm. My question concerns "existing light" (i.e. late pm) shooting. The options I am looking at are: HP5 or Tri-X "pushed," or one of Delta 3200 or T-Max 3200. Has anyone here done comparison tests with these four films? Do any of these films give more consistent results than others? I expect to be working with a variety of light sources if that bears on the issue.
 
Delta 3200 and Tmax 3200 give a lot better tonality than pushed 400 speed films. I've used both extensively at 3200 and 1600 and both the Delta and Tmax are good films. I like the Delta 3200 slightly more than Tmax 3200, but if you can only get Tmax, its good too.

marys-bar11.jpg

Tmax 3200 at 1600


fiesta-2006-7.jpg

Tmax 3200 at 1600


funnel-cakes.jpg

Delta 3200 at 1600


deserted-carnival.jpg

Delta 3200 at 1600


god-bless-festival.jpg

Delta 3200 at 3200


obama-doll.jpg

Delta 3200 at 3200

All of these examples were developed in Tmax Developer, which is the best developer I have found for either of the 3200 films.
 
Has anyone here done comparison tests with these four films?

They have been extensively tested. The "3200" films provide about a stop more shadow detail.
Curves for TMax 400 followed by P3200 (From the Kodak website*):
TMAX400.jpg

p3200.jpg


(*I won't be surprised if not long from now I'll be indicating "Historical information from the internet..." when referring to Kodak products.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought these films were great when they came out. However, even back in the 1980s, it seems every roll I got was already fogged pretty bad, and I was not certain I was getting my extra full stop worth of performance.
 
Nice work with both films, Chris. Given that another respondent mentioned potential (?) fogging issues, I will test both emulsions ahead of time. I buy all my film from B&H in NYC, so the fogging concern - depending upon the treatment by customs - may or not be a concern; but it is something that will influence my choice. Thanks to all who took time to respond.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom