• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Suggestions on shooting/processing "existing light" black and white?

BradleyK

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
946
Location
Burnaby, BC
Format
Multi Format
In early August I am heading to Louisiana and Mississippi to spend a month shooting a mixture of architecture, landscape, documentary and street work (multi-format, of course). For most of my color work - both 35mm and 2 1/4 - I have decided on a mix (depending upon subject matter) of E100G and E100VS. Given that Ektachrome P800/1600 is no longer available, I have opted to use digital for any "existing light" color work I shoot. For black and white work, during normal daylight hours, I have opted for FP4 for 2 1/4 shooting and either HP5 or Tri-X for 35mm. My question concerns "existing light" (i.e. late pm) shooting. The options I am looking at are: HP5 or Tri-X "pushed," or one of Delta 3200 or T-Max 3200. Has anyone here done comparison tests with these four films? Do any of these films give more consistent results than others? I expect to be working with a variety of light sources if that bears on the issue.
 

chriscrawfordphoto

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,893
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Format
Medium Format
Delta 3200 and Tmax 3200 give a lot better tonality than pushed 400 speed films. I've used both extensively at 3200 and 1600 and both the Delta and Tmax are good films. I like the Delta 3200 slightly more than Tmax 3200, but if you can only get Tmax, its good too.


Tmax 3200 at 1600



Tmax 3200 at 1600



Delta 3200 at 1600



Delta 3200 at 1600



Delta 3200 at 3200



Delta 3200 at 3200

All of these examples were developed in Tmax Developer, which is the best developer I have found for either of the 3200 films.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,751
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Has anyone here done comparison tests with these four films?

They have been extensively tested. The "3200" films provide about a stop more shadow detail.
Curves for TMax 400 followed by P3200 (From the Kodak website*):



(*I won't be surprised if not long from now I'll be indicating "Historical information from the internet..." when referring to Kodak products.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,751
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I thought these films were great when they came out. However, even back in the 1980s, it seems every roll I got was already fogged pretty bad, and I was not certain I was getting my extra full stop worth of performance.
 
OP
OP

BradleyK

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
946
Location
Burnaby, BC
Format
Multi Format
Nice work with both films, Chris. Given that another respondent mentioned potential (?) fogging issues, I will test both emulsions ahead of time. I buy all my film from B&H in NYC, so the fogging concern - depending upon the treatment by customs - may or not be a concern; but it is something that will influence my choice. Thanks to all who took time to respond.