A friend has a very nice RB 67 SD with a nice collection of lenses, at an attractive price. However, it appears that all three backs are 220 backs. I don't believe they are switchable between 220 and 120, are they? On my 645, the insert is one or the other.
He has only ever used 220 film, so doesn't remember. I tend toward B&W, so I would really want to shoot 120.
Anyone have first hand knowledge on this? Thanks!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
As Stone said, the deals are there, but many of the 120 backs out there are very likely to need light seals (even ones from Adorama!)so be prepared to replace them.
-Jim
Oh right!! I have an RZ so they stopped using foam, just perfect machining of plastic/metal with groves...So I didn't have to worry about that.my bad...
The Pro 120 backs won't give you double exposure prevention.
Pro-S 120 backs are rarely that inexpensive unless they are in bad shape. They also use foam.
Pro-SD 120 backs are hard to find, but worth the premium.
You can use 120 in a 220 back, but it is tough on the backs, and you always risk not noticing that you are past the end of the film.
My "23" Graphic pin roller w/ knob RH-8 does not fit in my RB67 Pro S. There is an extra rib on it. Just a note.
Of course if it did fit I'd be wasting film, but the RB 120 backs are going for a premium these days since there is so little 220 about.
Also, from my experience with several, the rb67 backs seem to be a weak point in system, both for light leaks and mechanical gremlins.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?