Stupid Kodak Indicator Stop Bath Question

first-church.jpg

D
first-church.jpg

  • 3
  • 2
  • 22
Grape Vines

A
Grape Vines

  • sly
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1
  • 0
  • 19
Plot Foiled

H
Plot Foiled

  • 1
  • 0
  • 29
FedEx Bread

H
FedEx Bread

  • 1
  • 0
  • 30
Unusual House Design

D
Unusual House Design

  • 4
  • 2
  • 70

Forum statistics

Threads
197,971
Messages
2,767,430
Members
99,516
Latest member
Fuji_Bro
Recent bookmarks
0

logan2z

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
3,672
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
I've always used Ilford's Ilfostop stop bath but recently decided to switch to Kodak Indicator stop bath and I'm about to use it for the first time. The instructions on the bottle say to mix 16ml of stop bath and 984ml of water to make 1 liter of working strength stop bath. The online Kodak directions say to mix the stop bath in a 1:63 dilution. Something doesn't add up - 16ml:984ml is not 1:63, it's 1:61.5. Maybe Kodak just decided to round up to make it simpler (then why not 1:62? 😉 ). I'm sure the exact dilution isn't super critical for stop bath but was just curious about the discrepancy.

Also, I use a 500ml Jobo 1520 tank for film developing. I assume it's perfectly fine to simply halve the quantities of stop bath and water to maintain the same dilution but mix 500ml of working solution instead of 1 liter. Not sure why Kodak doesn't just list the dilution instead of the amount of working strength, like Ilford does. Presumably there's enough stop bath in 500ml of working strength to adequately stop development in the 30 secs recommended by Kodak.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,268
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Historically, Kodak dilution instructions used 1:63 the same way as Ilford used 1 + 63.
But outside of that, Kodak could have specified 15.625 ml + 984.75 ml for the exact ratio, but that might not have been particularly helpful.
For indicator stop bath, the exact concentration isn't particularly critical.
And yes, it isn't really the volume that matters for the sort of developing we do, it is the concentration.
If you were mixing up stop bath for a large commercial dip and dunk machine, you might very well be using the old 16 oz bottles to make up the 8 US gallons of working strength stop bath - that is where the ratios came from originally.
FWIW, if I'm not developing multiple rolls of film, I mix it up half strength, and discard it after using (and possibly re-using) it for a day's session. It works fine that way, and doesn't smell quite as bad.
 
OP
OP

logan2z

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
3,672
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
Historically, Kodak dilution instructions used 1:63 the same way as Ilford used 1 + 63.
But outside of that, Kodak could have specified 15.625 ml + 984.75 ml for the exact ratio, but that might not have been particularly helpful.
For indicator stop bath, the exact concentration isn't particularly critical.
And yes, it isn't really the volume that matters for the sort of developing we do, it is the concentration.
If you were mixing up stop bath for a large commercial dip and dunk machine, you might very well be using the old 16 oz bottles to make up the 8 US gallons of working strength stop bath - that is where the ratios came from originally.
FWIW, if I'm not developing multiple rolls of film, I mix it up half strength, and discard it after using (and possibly re-using) it for a day's session. It works fine that way, and doesn't smell quite as bad.

Thanks Matt. I'll just mix it using 8ml of concentrate and 492ml of water and use it over multiple sessions until the indicator kicks in.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
I'm sure the exact dilution isn't super critical for stop bath but was just curious about the discrepancy.

I think you’re right and to be honest after accurately measuring for a while I just wing it nowadays and judge by color. If it’s yellow I’m mellow. 👍
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,268
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Thanks Matt. I'll just mix it using 8ml of concentrate and 492ml of water and use it over multiple sessions until the indicator kicks in.

That is probably okay with the acetic acid based Kodak stuff - although you should discard it when it looks distinctly less yellow - don't wait until you see blue/magenta.
It isn't a good idea with the citric acid based stuff like Ilfostop - nasties can start growing in it.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,608
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I've always used Ilford's Ilfostop stop bath but recently decided to switch to Kodak Indicator stop bath and I'm about to use it for the first time. The instructions on the bottle say to mix 16ml of stop bath and 984ml of water to make 1 liter of working strength stop bath. The online Kodak directions say to mix the stop bath in a 1:63 dilution. Something doesn't add up - 16ml:984ml is not 1:63, it's 1:61.5. Maybe Kodak just decided to round up to make it simpler (then why not 1:62? 😉 ). I'm sure the exact dilution isn't super critical for stop bath but was just curious about the discrepancy.

Also, I use a 500ml Jobo 1520 tank for film developing. I assume it's perfectly fine to simply halve the quantities of stop bath and water to maintain the same dilution but mix 500ml of working solution instead of 1 liter. Not sure why Kodak doesn't just list the dilution instead of the amount of working strength, like Ilford does. Presumably there's enough stop bath in 500ml of working strength to adequately stop development in the 30 secs recommended by Kodak.

For indicator stop bath, the exact concentration isn't particularly critical.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,171
Format
4x5 Format
1:63 is 1/2 oz to make 1 qt of working solution. Or, if you prefer (cough) use 2 drams to make a pint.

If you insist on liters then it would be 4 5/16 drams to a liter. Better to use quarts....

Half ounce to make a quart! Thanks.

I have a strange glass tube with ten marks to a quarter ounce.

And I always use four of those marks to a quart.

That is 1/10 ounce to 32 ounces.

I probably will forget this tomorrow, but four marks is what I settled on.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
21,500
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I'm sure the exact dilution isn't super critical for stop bath

Exactly. I'd go with "a dash to a jar of water" and call it good.


Presumably there's enough stop bath in 500ml of working strength to adequately stop development in the 30 secs

Absolutely.

So don't sweat it. 1+63, 1+61.5, 1+70, 1+50 - it really doesn't matter. No fuss.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,706
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
There really isn’t much of a reason to use stop bath with film.

My understanding is that any difference between water stop and acid stop in the processed negative depends largely on the length of the development time For very short times such as round about 5 mins then acid stop might make a measurable difference or might even make a difference that you can see in the processed print but if a video on such a test exists Í haven't heard of it or seen it

I can't say that over my kind of times of 10-12 mins development times I saw any difference when I switched to a water stop involving about 3 dumps of water

pentaxuser
 

laser

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
1,041
Format
4x5 Format
The dilution of stop bath isn't very critical. One glug is about right.

Stopbath lowers the pH and stops development quickly so if you are doing precise development it will help. It also increases the capacity of your fixer. That said the only time I regularly used stop bath was when making technical images that required density matching +/- .01. Timing was within 1 second.
 

laser

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
1,041
Format
4x5 Format
After I posted I realized I also used stop bath to increase the capacity of fixer in replenished high volume film and paper processors including the Royalprint Processor Model 417. 4= activator+stop+fix+wash, 17 = 17 inches wide. A great workhorse paper processor for Incorporated Developer (ID) Papers. Interestingly X-Omat (x-ray film) Processors did not use a stop. This was a trade off of processing time (dry-to-dry) of 90 seconds (1980) for fix capacity. It was better to spend the time in fixer than stop bath.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,171
Format
4x5 Format
Additional comment. When I mix a tenth of an ounce to 32 ounces, I get pH 4.1

It only takes a couple prints dragging through until it turns from orange to purple. You can see it in the tray by light of safelight.

So basically “indicator water”. If you were to use 32 ounces of water in a tray as a stop bath, replace the water frequently. Two or three prints.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom