Stunning Contax III set value?

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 0
  • 0
  • 27
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 32
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 12
  • 4
  • 119
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,916
Messages
2,783,066
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
2

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,764
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
A friend of mine just sent me a series of photos of an absolutely stunning Contax III outfit with 3 lenses (50mm, 35mm, 135mm red T variety), turret viewfinder, close-up set and Contameter. He knows the camera is valuable, but would like an unbiased appraisal of the value of the outfit.

I do NOT have permission to post photos of the camera (I will ask again), so I can't show anyone yet but I can tell you that from what I see, it is the definition of dead-Mint if I have ever seen dead-Mint.

This is out of my wheelhouse.

Where can one get an unbiased opinion of the true value of the set?

( and yes I do understand it must be physically evaluated to establish actual value, but he wants a realtive value at the moment)

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,764
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
OK, he said it was OK to post a few photos...

Contax III _ 1.jpg
Contax III _ 2.jpg
Contax III _ 3jpg.png
Contax III _ 4jpg.jpg
 

Perry Way

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
919
Location
San Luis Obispo
Format
Multi Format
Sweet camera, if it were the same glass and the Contax II I would be drooling over it right now. You'd have to clean up all that slobber for sure. I wouldn't have any experience in valuation but from the prices I've seen this could be about a $5,000 kit?
 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,764
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
I, frankly, wouldn't want the camera. I like cameras I can shoot with. This thing belongs in a museum...
 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,764
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
It's simply that I would worry too much about damaging the finish and couldn't enjoy using it, not that I would not like the camera itself...
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
Yes, put it on a shelf. This is for a collector. No idea about cash value. I am a camera accumulator, not a collector.
Personally, I do not find the III versions aesthetically pleasing with meter stuck on top. I do shoot with IIa, and a Kiev is my stormy weather camera.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,481
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format
It's not a Contax III, but a Contax IIIa. Serial number put it made between October and December 1954. There were 5 000 of the "C" series made in late 54, early 55, so not exactly a rare item, this out of the nearly 70 000 Contax IIIa made between 1951 and 1962. This one has the more common "color dials", not as rare as the early "black dials". This also affects value.

This is obviously is wonderful cosmetic condition, but value will also depend on who your friend wants to sell it to. A collector who would want to keep it on a shelf might pay higher than someone who actually wants to use it. In that case, value will depend on whether or not it's in good working condition.

Like any mechanical object, a camera actually needs to be used to be kept in good working condition — used often, and cleaned, lubricated and adjusted often. If it's been sitting on a shelf or in a box for the last 60, 70 years, chances are it'll have problems. Moreover, Contax IIa and IIIa have known problems that develop with age, notably to the shutter and the viewfinder—I just had to return a IIa to a seller because there was major vertical alignment problems in the viewfinder, something that often happens with this camera. Lots of info on this here: http://zeisscamera.com/first.shtml

People buy old film cameras less and less for collecting purposes but more and more to actually use them—this is the case even with Leica cameras. A perfectly working camera with esthetic defects can be as much, if not more valuable than a non-working beautifully kept camera. Before asserting value on this one, that needs to be checked.

Lenses will need to be checked for the usual suspects (dust, fog, fungus). The 50mm f/2 Sonnar is not as valuable as the 50mm f/1.5 and sells for about 175-200$US on eBay these days. The 35mm f/2.8 Biogon is supposed to be a great lens. You can find one for about 450-500$US. Again, precise value will be determined on the working condition of the lens.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom