Being in the lucky possession of one of @fgorga's actual prints, I can say that the brick-red/brown hue in real life is even more vivid than how it appears here on my monitor. It's quite compelling, really. I've only tried cuprotypes once and ended up with a much weaker/flat result, btw. I understand there are generally speaking two approaches to the process: @fgorga's approach as documented e.g. here on the forum but also here https://www.alternativephotography.com/cuprotype-process/
And then there's the process as described in the 1970s by Patterson's and that was reproduced some 20 years ago by @Cor : https://web.archive.org/web/20070923010637/http://silverghost.stanford.edu/copper/index.html
CUPROTYPE: a photographic print of reddish brown Copper II Ferrocyanide (Hatchett’s Brown) pigment on paper.
www.darkroomdoc.com
There're some supposedly new but yet unpublished processes whose results I've seen only on Facebook. Fortunately, these new processes are appearing in a new book on Cuprotype written by Vincenzo Caniparoli.
Ah I think context is upthread a couple posts. These are all bleached back in sodium carbonate until it just starts to hit the blacks (10-15min), then toned back with tannic acid for 50-60min.