I went through my archives, and found a few shots taken at f22, and it looked good at ISO 200 (default for my camera) with just one light at full power (these where from 2008 and I only had 1 strobe at the time). I also just did a test at ISO 400 with the flash at the back of a room (10'x15'), pointed at the ceiling (white), and I was able to get a good exposure.
So, it may still be a stretch as I wouldn't have any power in reserve, but it is workable.
Honestly, I am having doubts about using 4x5 for portraits. It can be done, and lots of people do it, but there are many challenges:
- Takes a relatively long time.
- Exposures are more expensive.
- Bulky to set up.
- Very limited in the types of images I can take.
But, it does have some massive advantages:
- I tend to be more careful and methodical, and as a result, my images look better to me.
- I have to plan to take pictures long before I actually take anything, so I have to be more pro-active and less lazy.
I have been considering using the 4X5 for landscapes and probably just going medium format for portraits, but I really don't want to spend any more money
and also, looking through the big ground glass at your composition is beyond words.
Slightly off topic, but any advice?
@Two23 - I thought it was a typo when you said 100ft
- thanks for clearing that up! Where can I view your images, very interested.