DBP said:If my 1946 Lawrence slide rule is correct, the guide number for a No 5 with ASA 100 film with an average reflector and shutter speed around 1/125 is about 250. If I use ASA 50, which probably closer to ISO 100 due to the safety margin in the original standard, the guide number comes out around 175. With a slower shutter speed, the GNs are 295 and 210 respectively. Some of the big 'potato masher' flashes can come close to 200 at full power. Maybe someone else on the forum can suggest a few choices.
DBP said:Some of the big 'potato masher' flashes can come close to 200 at full power. Maybe someone else on the forum can suggest a few choices.
Pragmatist said:It is a combination of things that give bulbs a distinctly different look from xenon. Aside from the sheer output, there is how the bulb "burns" When you fire a bulb, the ignition starts in the center, and goes outward. This means that the most intense light output is in the center of the projected circle, decreasing outward. As a result, the central parts of an illuminated scene are "hotter", with a decreasing fallout toward the edges.
Second is the reflector itself. I have a Heiland unit, and use #25 Press with it. The Graflex are similar. The reflector bowl is a special parabolic design, and is adjustable to capture the apex of the bulb flashoff and project it forward, depending on the distance of the camera from the subject. This couples up with the "center out" illumination characteristic of the bulb itself. These factors are what lend the "Wegee" or "Hollywood" look to larger flashbulb photography.
Xenons scatter their light in a generally uniform path, and the reflectors they reside in are fixed in a way to maximize the output lumens across a broad range of distances. Various diffusers and concentrators are available, but they do not exactly mimic the effect of a bulb flash. It might be possible to make a "vignette" type mask of screed material to mimic the edge falloff, but I still dont think that it will match the unique character of the real thing.
David A. Goldfarb said:I suspect the #5 is a little more powerful, but here's one across a 5-lane New York City street--
Norman 200C pack, GVI auto strobe head, 5" plain reflector, Efke PL 100/Acufine (EI 200), 4x5" Tech V (image is about half the frame), Symmar 210/5.6 convertible at f:5.6, handheld, 1/15 sec. to catch a little motion.
David A. Goldfarb said:If you want the effect of the old reflector with the convenience of electronic flash, I've seen Graflex flashguns with the guts of a Norman LH-2 head stuffed in the battery case and a flashtube socket in place of the old bulb socket. It looks like a fairly straightforward modification. Not sure what guide number you get with that.
As far as the falloff issue goes in the Weegee days, I wonder how much of that was due to the fact that they were using 135mm and 127mm lenses that just barely covered the format and might have been on the wide side for the flash reflector, and how much was the flashbulb pattern.
Donald Qualls said:Just my opinion, but I think most of the difference between the old flashbulb photos and those made with strobes is the reflector size. A photoflash in a 6" bowl acts like a light source six inches across -- the biggest reflector I've seen on a factory-built strobe was about two inches across, and most are smaller than that. That makes a strobe act more like a "point source" compared to the extended source of a large reflector -- which means the shadows cast by the flash have relatively hard, sharp edges compared to those made by a large reflector, giving an effect like the difference between a bright overcast and direct sun.
That said, it's a lot cheaper to shoot a few #5 bulbs now and then than it is to get a strobe with the same guide number and remount it in a large reflector. I wonder, though, if you couldn't mount a common strobe backward, with a diffuser on the lens, and then reflect that light from a bowl reflector to get a light quality similar to a bulb in a big bowl? Or use a bounce flash firing upward into an diffuse bowl? Anything that will get the light to shine from a larger area instead of what amounts to a point from several feet away...
MattKing said:.... edit
Are Alien Bees a little bit like the old reflectors?
Donald Qualls said:Just my opinion, but I think most of the difference between the old flashbulb photos and those made with strobes is the reflector size. A photoflash in a 6" bowl acts like a light source six inches across -- the biggest reflector I've seen on a factory-built strobe was about two inches across, and most are smaller than that. That makes a strobe act more like a "point source" compared to the extended source of a large reflector -- which means the shadows cast by the flash have relatively hard, sharp edges compared to those made by a large reflector, giving an effect like the difference between a bright overcast and direct sun.
That said, it's a lot cheaper to shoot a few #5 bulbs now and then than it is to get a strobe with the same guide number and remount it in a large reflector. I wonder, though, if you couldn't mount a common strobe backward, with a diffuser on the lens, and then reflect that light from a bowl reflector to get a light quality similar to a bulb in a big bowl? Or use a bounce flash firing upward into an diffuse bowl? Anything that will get the light to shine from a larger area instead of what amounts to a point from several feet away...
If you are talking about a portable electronic flash Lachlan I don,t think the output from most powerful ones will give the same output as some of the smaller flashbulbs.Lachlan Young said:Can anyone recommend an electronic flashgun of equivalent output to the GE#(?) No.5 flashbulb?
All help much appreciated,
Lachlan
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?