It looks like the same marks appear in both scans.
I assume that, for the street scene, the scanner traveled down the image as it appears on-screen and , for the building facade, the scanner traveled across. Correct?
You can use PS to superimpose both images and you will find almost identical marks.
It could have been caused by dirt in the film path as the film traveled through the camera or by grit on the lips of the film cartridge but I wouldn't expect the marks to be virtually identical if that was true.
I suggest a test. Scan something else which you know doesn't have scratches or damage. Try scanning a piece of white paper on the flatbed or try a piece of film which you have scanned before without problem. If the marks appear in a scan of known-good media then the problem has been confirmed to be in the scanner.
If the problem is confirmed to be in the scanner, I can only guess where the problem lies. It could be "dead pixels" in the scanning element. It could be dirt inside the scanner. (Dust particles on the scanning bar.) According to the specifications, the device has a cold cathode lamp so I doubt that there is a problem with the light source. If that was true I wouldn't expect the marks to be so regular.
If the problem is because of dirt, you might be able to clean the scanner and restore it to full function if you are careful. If the problem is because of dead pixels on the scanning element, I have no suggestions for you. In that case, I would say the scanner is done for.