- Joined
- May 3, 2015
- Messages
- 10
- Format
- Medium Format
What is the line in #4, and do you use washes?
If the line is a real process defect, it indicates insufficient solutions and agitation.
If it is not, then you need a stop bath after the developer. Use 2% acetic acid.
PE
That line indicates that the solution only came to that level in the tank and it sat at that level too long. Then, agitation was insufficient. But it also hints that you need a stop due to that agitation problem.
PE
Well, three thoughts.
1. You said you did use a prewet above.
2. They are not streaks except in picture #4 which is a precursor and worst of the other smudges.
3. I'll bet the 35 mm was above or below #4 in the tank. It therefore avoided any static solution as you poured in and out.
PE
Prewet is always useful in these situations.
A stop bath is suggested by Kodak if you get streaks.
And Jobo suggests using the right amount of solution, pouring rapidly, and if you can, have the tank running instantly. With the lift, the tank can be running as you pour.
Those are the 3 things that can lead to what you have gotten.
Thanks for the further explanation, but it does not clarify the matter until you try the above. Best wishes.
PE
The Rollei Compard C-41 bleach operates at pH 4.3 and is composed like Flexicolor bleach III, there should be no need for a stop bath. I could imagine, though, that the strong bleach oxidizes color developer directly and thereby creates these streaks. My recommendation is quecontentoestoy try a sulfite clearing bath between color developer and bleach. Ideally it would be some mixture like 10 g/l Sodium Sulfite plus 10 g/l Sodium Metabisulfite. If quecontentoestoy has no access to such raw chems (try Fototechnik Suvatlar if you live in Europe), a stop bath plus a thorough wash may substitute for the clearing bath.
#2 is classic example to me at least of what I call Road Ruts.. which manifest as minus density on film which in turn prints dark
I was getting this one summer and basically had to stop process until I figured it out.
For me the solution was distilled water... and initial agitation off the machine first as if you were manually processing in a small steel tank.
Both changes got rid of the problem.. you are seeing the damage mostly in nuetral smooth areas of the scene, in more complex areas of detail
you will see less due to basic camoflague.
Hi everyone!
As you can see I am new to APUG, been reading a lot of post but never joined and today I come to you with one question.
I may have misunderstood what Bob meant but it sounds as if he used a machine processor( Jobo or similar rotary processor?) after he used inversion.
I wonder what the initial manual inversion did that rotary or machine processing didn't manage?
pentaxuser
Bob I have one concern about it. While using the jobo tank with the machine less developer is needed than when inverting manually. How manual inverting help to reach all the film's surface faster than the rotary machine while having less chemicals inside the tank.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?