Bumba, I will take it that in the absence of any rebuttal of my statement, you used the same filtration of Y and M in all three strips but presumably the exposures differ The order in which you made the exposures were as you have stated so it went from "worst" to nearly OK ( the more grey floor) then back to "worse again" What were the three exposures, just as a matter of interest?
I also take it that they were all developed one after the other i.e. within minutes of each other. If I have described everything that happened accurately then as far as I can see what appears to have happened has no reason to happen.
I cannot say what a large change in bulb illumination during the test strips might be able to do such as change the colour balance but I'd have thought that such a change in illumination would have been seen by you.
It is almost as if the dichroic filters were at the worst setting i.e. the setting you chose just prior to the first exposure then by themselves moved to the best then slipped again but not quite back to the worse setting that you had made I take it that you have a dichroic head. If you used a filter tray then the filters cannot move so as unlikely as my previous scenario is, it then becomes impossible
I just don't have an explanation that can reconcile the problems with the procedure you describe
If it is a dichroic head then all I can suggest is that you examine the M and Y dials by zeroing all 3 then moving each in turn from 0 to max checking if each changes as you increase the setting. Then choose any setting or better still the setting you used and switch the enlarger on and off three times checking each time if colour cast changes by itself
I hope that others here can come up with suggestions about the cause that explains what you experienced. Frankly I am now out of ideas
pentaxuser
Sorry, I'll do my best to address these points.
All three exposures were made with the same filtration, f stop and time. I was trying to test if I was getting any consistency. They should be exactly identical if everything was working correctly.
They were developed within hours of each other, in drums and from a fresh batch of chemicals that has been well replenished. The chemicals are stored in a 500ml bottle with all air excluded between processes.
I made the top one first, I was confused by it as it shouldn't have been red. I then made the middle one after making no changes and it went back to somewhat normal. Just to double check I thought I'd make a third and see what I would get and then it went back to red.
I just looked through my old test strips and I had something similar before I changed my old bulb. I took out my old bulb, cleaned the terminals, then when I put it back in my density went really poor. O took the bulb out and put it back in, density went up then without changing anything I'd get massive shifts of red between prints without reason or without changing anything. I then changed the bulb after that and it fixed the problem. This was only a few months ago so that's why I'm thinking the bulb holder could be the problem.
Bumba - You're within driving distance of Secondhand Darkroom Supplies in Oxfordshire. Maybe these frustrations you're having are frequent enough to consider buying a new enlarger:
https://www.secondhanddarkroom.co.uk/product/durst-370-colour-enlarger/
Ahh I'd rather fix the problem if I could but it would probably be wiser to get a new one. Do you think I could detect a problem with a multimeter?