• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Story of a 35mm: Nikon Canon Zeiss


Good point sir, and thanks for the link.
 

There are two aspects that tend to get overlooked in the rapid changes in lens design - the arrival of on-site computer design - even Zeiss' engineers had to book time on off-site computers for lens design until the early 1970s - and the simultaneous arrival of MTF as the major design aim/ measure of lens behaviour.
 
Ha and some would say that the arrival of MTF as a 'major design aim' as the beginning of the end of lenses made with 'character'.

As for the cost analysis for the glass types the thick elemenst that I've referenced is in reality quite small; a quick measure on my copy of the 6 element 'K' optical design shows the front element having a diameter of @ 28mm.I bet the weight of those element would be in the grams.
 

This is a very interesting point, because, contrary to popular belief, computers were used for optical design since the late 1950s, even in Japan. But there is a big difference between having only ONE computer available for the whole company vs more than one computer. And of course, on-site vs off-site.

Some companies even built their own computers: Fuji built the first japanese electronic computer. Canon was already a popular electronic calculator manufacturer on the '60s, so I wouldn't be suprised if they had some custom hardware at the early 60s.
 
Two quick additions; The Vivitar Series One lenses were a byproduct of using the NASA supercomputers overnight computing time to calculate their original optical designs (90mm and that macro zoom, the 28-90mm and the 28mm f/1.9 etc). I think I recall that the Vivitar project came out of Brook's Accutar re-computation of the Kodak Commercial Ektar lenses in the early 1970's.
 
Two quick additions; The Vivitar Series One lenses were a byproduct of using the NASA supercomputers overnight computing time to calculate their original optical designs (90mm and that macro zoom, the 28-90mm and the 28mm f/1.9 etc).

This is not correct.

The story is well explained here:

https://blog.camera-wiki.org/2012/03/13/vivitar-historical-research-part-1/

In short: Ellis Betensky, optical designer, worked in Perkin Elmer which is a government contractor for optical systems for the NASA.

Elis Betensky approached Vivitar to design the macro focusing zoom. He used Perkin Elmer's computers for this (independent) job. And then:

“We knew Bentensky was brilliant. But we didn’t know his muscular mind was not matched by common sense, for it seemed he had completed our contract without involving the owners of his computer time. Finally he presented us with the design for the first 70-210mm Auto-Optimizing Macro-focusing Zoom Lens. And Perkin-Elmer presented us with a bill for computer time of $1M (in 1971 dollars – equivalent to $5.7M today!), and a claim of copyright infringement for using their intellectual property. Vigorous negotiations followed.”​

I've checked tests of some Series 1 lenses like the 135/2.3 or the 35-85/2.8 zoom. The offerings by Nikon or Canon are better (i.e. FD 80-200/4. FD 35-70/2.8-3.5, FD 135/3.5). Too much hype and marketing by vivitar. Yes, the 90mm macro is very good, but so are the 85 teles and 100mm macros by the original manufacturers.
 
Last edited:
PS: This is what vivitar said on their maketing (source: printed ad for the 35-85):



So, american lens designers were doing work commissioned by the NASA (correct), and some of those same designers (well, one) "modified these lens designs" (here the marketing BS begins) ...
 
Last edited: