Good morning;
Hmmmmm. It has been a while, and not very much has been said here. I guess that it is time to say something again to show that there is still life here in the Bolshie Blads forum, and a continuing interest in Kiev and other FSU cameras.
Since we last talked, there have been a few additions to the Kiev Arsenal here (sorry about that one, but I just could not resist). Earlier it was mentioned that a Tair-33B 300mm f:4.5 lens was coming to join the Jupiter-36B 250mm f:3.5 lens. It did. However, it also had just the mounting ring for the lens hood threaded into the filter threads and it was stuck there, and it took a while to get it out. This is the odd Kiev Arsenal 88mm by 0.75mm filter thread, and it will need a step-up ring to go to the more common 95mm filter threads for use with filters and a new lens hood. The Heliopan people do make that Step-Up Ring, but it is $70 here in the USA. Then, a Mir-3B 65mm f:3.5 wide angle was found. Following that, a Vega-12C 90mm f:2.8 was located. Then a Pentacon Prakticar 500mm f:5.6 long telephoto lens was sent to me, but it also spent 7 weeks in the US Customs International Parcel Inspection Facility at JFK Airport on Long Island in New York. The Prakticar 500/5.6 does take an unusual 118mm by 1.0mm thread pitch filter thread, so it may be necessary to find a step-up ring to use the more common 122mm diameter filters with it. Next came a CZJ Biometar 120mm f:2.8 short telephoto lens in P-6 mount that was recommended as a good working lens for portraits. Then recently there was another Jupiter-36C 250mm f:3.5 lens sent here also along with an ARAX-60 or ARAX modified Kiev-60 120 roll film body which really does look like a 35mm SLR camera that was force-fed steroids as a kid.
Well, yes, I can make observations about the size and the weight of the ARAX-60 or Kiev-60, but I must admit also that it really does work nicely, and that MLU is a very nice feature. There is a noticeable difference in the way that it works in comparison with the Kiev-6C cameras that are here.
So, that is what has happened with the Kiev cameras here over the last year. There have been a few rolls of 120 film run through them, and I am developing a liking for what they do on a negative. (yes, I know, another one)
And, in my continuing quest for a copy of "the people's camera," there is an effort being made to find a Smena-8M.
So, yes, my interest in FSU cameras does continue. And, now I seem to have just about everything that I wanted to get for the Kiev-88, Kiev-88CM and the Kiev-6C and ARAX-60 cameras in the way of lenses. However, now I have run into another problem. One lens you may have noticed is not in my Kiev Arsenal; the 45mm Mir-26B 45mm f:3.5 or the Mir-69B 45mm f:3.5, although the Mir-69B is considered to be rare. There have been reports of lens resolution problems with the Mir-26B, but it may be possible to bring it up to equivalent performance with the later Mir-69B by having a good lens technician bring the lens back to the specifications for you to improve the lens resolution. One thing they will not be able to do is to eliminate the noticeable barrel distortion in the design of this lens, in both the Mir-26B and the Mir-69B versions. I have not yet bought one because of that, but I may need to do so anyway, due to other pressures that I never anticipated.
So, yes, there is still interest in and work on the "Bolshie Blads" here.
Enjoy;
Ralph
Latte Land, Washington, USA