The biggest shock for me is the joy of looking through the big, bright viewfinder of my Pentax SLRs, and the disappointment of going back to the relatively small electronic viewfinders of my mirrorless cameras.
I was out shooting with my Leica IIIc the other day and after each shot I caught myself looking at the back of the camera like Pavlov's dog. #facepalm
Anyone else do this?
On my X-Pro1, my chosen settings retain the just-shot photo in the viewfinder for about a second (obviously I don't shoot sports). With my D700 and the Fuji, I review my photos on the rear screen much later after my shooting - so if I miss a shot, it's too late to re-shoot.
This learned behaviour (of waiting) is from shooting film since I was about 11 (early 1960's).
So it's not just me that has to do that.Yes -- I will often reopen the lens after removing the film holder and check the GG to make sure that I did not move the camera. I sometimes forget to lock down all the dang knobs on the camera and tripod (4x5 to 11x14 -- all have different knobs in different places!)
Well -- sometimes I do it just because I am so pleased with the set-up that I just want to see it on the GG again...So it's not just me that has to do that.
I used to shoot a 4x5 B&J Speed Press and a 5x7 Commercial View, both simple to set up. Now I'm shooting a Dorff clone and find it fiddly, more knobs than I'm used to diddling with, and under the focus cloth it gets frustrating. I've blown a couple of really nice shots because of it, so now I look.Well -- sometimes I do it just because I am so pleased with the set-up that I just want to see it on the GG again...
The view on the LCD can be magnified many times and allows you to scroll about the image to check for focus, DoF and exposure values. That is far superior to looking through any viewfinder.The viewfinder on even my D4 is pathetic compared to a Pentax AP, much less my OM1.
^^^ This happens to me constantly!I don't chimp, but when I shoot, even with my IIIf, people say can I see that photo.
I tell my Intro to Digital students to look at the LCD after each shot and do an analysis; you would be a fool not to use such a tool, especially when you are just learning to understand exposure. I also have them bracket so that they can analyze exposures on the computer as they really don't know what a good exposure is yet. As they become more fluid we add the Histogram to appreciate highlights and dark tones.
I watch new students develop terribly exposed or blank rolls or rolls of poor focus or DoF. I don't listen to that blue-collar attitude that shooting without the LCD teaches you...fill in the blank here. It is a waste of time and materials. The digital students after 1 semester far outstrip the film students in their ability to handle a camera. The folk who can teach anything but film refuse to admit that. We just got rid of one of those, thank goodness.
Film folk don't have that facility. If they did from the git-go, they would be fools not to use it. If you don't use it now because you have a zillion years of experience, well, more power to ya. If you don't want to use it for any reason (look ma, no hands) that is up to you. To decry such a method as chimping is being small and smarmy. I'm not impressed. Sneering is not an argument.
I was out shooting with my Leica IIIc the other day and after each shot I caught myself looking at the back of the camera like Pavlov's dog. #facepalm
Anyone else do this?
What is chimping, sorry for ignoranceI was out shooting with my Leica IIIc the other day and after each shot I caught myself looking at the back of the camera like Pavlov's dog. #facepalm
Anyone else do this?
I turned auto-preview off on my digital cameras ages ago to avoid wasting battery power to display previews I'm not actually going to look at. Rear screen stays off unless I deliberately press the button to show it.
I found it far less distracting that way, and removed a lot of the natural urge to review each and every photo I took.
To "chimp" is sort of an abbreviation of "check image" - used with a bit of a derogatory tone by some.What is chimping, sorry for ignorance
...
Film folk don't have that facility. If they did from the git-go, they would be fools not to use it. If you don't use it now because you have a zillion years of experience, well, more power to ya. If you don't want to use it for any reason (look ma, no hands) that is up to you. To decry such a method as chimping is being small and smarmy. I'm not impressed. Sneering is not an argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?