'State of the photochemical industry in 2023' Esp. Tetenal 1847 & ORWO

Waiting to board

H
Waiting to board

  • Tel
  • May 5, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Tomato

A
Tomato

  • 2
  • 0
  • 39
Cool

A
Cool

  • 4
  • 0
  • 55
Coquitlam River BC

D
Coquitlam River BC

  • 6
  • 2
  • 48
Mayday celebrations

A
Mayday celebrations

  • 2
  • 3
  • 93

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,565
Messages
2,761,144
Members
99,405
Latest member
Dave in Colombia
Recent bookmarks
0

Arcadia4

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
314
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
This recent article from Silvergrain Classics on the 'State of the photochemical industry in 2023' has some interesting detail on the complexities surrounding Tetenal 1847 and ORWO.


The rest of the article holds no surprises, although Fuji is notable for its absence, even as a supplier of C-41 and RA4 process chemistry and paper
 

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,972
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
To quote from that article, "Ilford Photo / Harman continues to struggle with adapting their film coating capacity to modern demands; the huge machines that ran until the early 2000s are no longer appropriate, but smaller machines sometimes struggle to keep customers and shops stocked."

- my understanding is that one advantage the Mobberley set up has is that the coating machine / facility is adaptable, is used for multiple product lines, and as far I'm aware this has been the case indefinitely.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,911
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
although Fuji is notable for its absence, even as a supplier of C-41 and RA4 process chemistry and paper

Which goes to show how massively biased the article is towards a consumer perspective and utterly fails to convince as an industry overview, even though the title suggests it.
Also, their old guard/analog believers/speculators taxonomy doesn't hold any water from a theoretical perspective with considerable overlap between these categories and a lack of a decent definition.

This is more gossip than news.
 

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,224
To quote from that article, "Ilford Photo / Harman continues to struggle with adapting their film coating capacity to modern demands; the huge machines that ran until the early 2000s are no longer appropriate, but smaller machines sometimes struggle to keep customers and shops stocked."

- my understanding is that one advantage the Mobberley set up has is that the coating machine / facility is adaptable, is used for multiple product lines, and as far I'm aware this has been the case indefinitely.

I went on a tour of the Ilford Mobberley site around 2008 [Pentaxuser was there] and we were shown the large coating machine and its control room. They had no grumbles that the machine was too big for the production in 2008 so since by many accounts demand for film has increased since then it is hard to see how the machine can be "no longer appropriate". The only smaller machine they had was a pilot plant used for testing. Admitted IDK what has occurred at the site since 2008.
 

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,972
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
I went on a tour of the Ilford Mobberley site around 2008 [Pentaxuser was there] and we were shown the large coating machine and its control room. They had no grumbles that the machine was too big for the production in 2008 so since by many accounts demand for film has increased since then it is hard to see how the machine can be "no longer appropriate". The only smaller machine they had was a pilot plant used for testing. Admitted IDK what has occurred at the site since 2008.

I agree. I went on the tour a year earlier.
 

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,972
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Also, their old guard/analog believers/speculators taxonomy doesn't hold any water from a theoretical perspective with considerable overlap between these categories and a lack of a decent definition.

Well, yes, and they make critical comments about investment firms in relation to Tetenal, at the same time as Ilford Photo / Harman is currently owned by Pemberstone, an investment firm.
 

halfaman

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,342
Location
Bilbao
Format
Multi Format
although Fuji is notable for its absence, even as a supplier of C-41 and RA4 process chemistry and paper

And Instax, the most succesfull film business by far... Seems that Fuji is the analog "who-must-be-not-named".


I went on a tour of the Ilford Mobberley site around 2008 [Pentaxuser was there] and we were shown the large coating machine and its control room. They had no grumbles that the machine was too big for the production in 2008 so since by many accounts demand for film has increased since then it is hard to see how the machine can be "no longer appropriate". The only smaller machine they had was a pilot plant used for testing. Admitted IDK what has occurred at the site since 2008.

What I heard 3-4 years ago from a well informed person is that Ilford coating line was very far from being at full capacity (same as Kodak). It worked like 3 days per week or something like that.
 
Last edited:

ChrisGalway

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 24, 2022
Messages
317
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
Hmmm, this does not make me confident we shall ever see Tetenal Colortec E6 kits ever again. Perhaps the HarmanPhoto treasure to be revealed on 1st December will bring us good news?
 

Tom Kershaw

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
4,972
Location
Norfolk, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
Hmmm, this does not make me confident we shall ever see Tetenal Colortec E6 kits ever again. Perhaps the HarmanPhoto treasure to be revealed on 1st December will bring us good news?

I realise the 3-bath Tetenal kits have a following. However, the 6-bath Bellini kit works very well in my experience, as an alternative.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,911
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Be that as it may, they're presence in Instax and RA4 materials is not a secret and it's widely advertised just about everywhere.
not speaking about anything to anyone

This is also not quite correct. They do speak, depending on who you talk to. The paper people are surprisingly open, approachable and eager to be in touch with photographers. It just seems that not all that many people bother to reach out to them.
 

ChrisGalway

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 24, 2022
Messages
317
Location
Ireland
Format
Medium Format
What a tragedy ... I wonder if anyone will make their Colortec E6 and other kits again? For now, I'll use Bellini, which gives good results and as importantly is a responsive company dedicated to film photography.
 

Ernst-Jan

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Messages
555
Location
NL
Format
Medium Format
What a tragedy ... I wonder if anyone will make their Colortec E6 and other kits again?
You might find this topic interesting

 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom