@mshchem Any long-ish tank holding two or more reels will work fine, but shorter ones will be less stable and wobble a bit.
But what about the driving rollers? Are they pressed onto the driving axles or fixed by set screws?
There also is seemingly a rear guiding roller (end-stop) on the driving axle, its seemingly front counterpart though is misplaced for this function. Maybe they are just intended as inertia masses.
The SST4 does not have the ability to heat chemistry. There's a bigger brother called SST5 which can. In my case I did not need this feature because I've always preferred using a regular basket with 110-120F water, this saves a lot of time and makes the processor more compact.
@AgX Why would someone want to use a single-reel tank in a processor? This has additional minimum chemical volume implications. Dual-reel tanks aren't just more stable, they also hold more chemistry which is something you want because JOBO minimums printed on their tanks are ridiculous.
Regarding chemical volume: I often found JOBO minimums to contradict datasheet minimums for various chemicals and have learned to ignore them. It's too easy to underdevelop your film if you follow the JOBO minimums and practice loading two 120 rolls on a single JOBO reel.
The primary reason for the upgrade was more accurate and sophisticated temperature control. The near-useless water bath has always been my gripe with the CPE. Instead of the crude knobs, the Stark uses an electronic display similar to bigger JOBOs with 0.1C
I have never used a CPE but does it not have a circulating pump?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?