Star Trails.

Diner

A
Diner

  • 3
  • 0
  • 56
Gulf Nonox

A
Gulf Nonox

  • 9
  • 3
  • 73
Druidstone

A
Druidstone

  • 8
  • 3
  • 112
On The Mound.

A
On The Mound.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 64
Ancient Camphor

D
Ancient Camphor

  • 6
  • 1
  • 76

Forum statistics

Threads
197,802
Messages
2,764,722
Members
99,480
Latest member
815 Photo
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,800
Location
Plymouth. UK
Format
Multi Format
Has anyone any experience with photographing star trails? This is something I have never done before.

I will probably use my RZ67 with 50mm lens and I have some HP5 Plus films, but not sure of any starting points of what f/stops and exposure times to begin with.

Being south-southwest UK based, it will most likely be around Dartmoor away from the city lights. Any help and suggestions welcome.
 

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
639
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
About 10 minutes at f/4.0 ISO 400, plus reciprocity failure. I prefer using Acros or 400H for the reciprocity characteristics. With 400H I'd go 20-30m at f/4

The stars will go 360 deg around Polaris in 24h, so you can tweak the f/stop to figure out the arc length. This one was 20m and the negative was thin. Pentax 6x7 55mm at f/4 400H.

 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,553
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Get Jim Ballard's book --

Handbook for Star Trackers: Making and Using Star Tracking Camera Platforms​

 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,588
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Has anyone any experience with photographing star trails? This is something I have never done before.

I will probably use my RZ67 with 50mm lens and I have some HP5 Plus films, but not sure of any starting points of what f/stops and exposure times to begin with.

Being south-southwest UK based, it will most likely be around Dartmoor away from the city lights. Any help and suggestions welcome.

I got decent results by pointing the camera at Polaris(on a tripod of course) and exposing for 10,20 and 30 minutes and f/2.8 Good luck
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,335
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
Use the lens wide open. The combination of focal length, aperture, and film speed (and brightness of your local sky) will determine how many stars are visible as trails [*]. The length of your exposure determines not how many stars are visible, but how long the trails are. A trail will rotate 15 degrees around the pole in 1 hour, so if you want short arcs you can go for say 20-30 minutes, but longer arcs need an hour or more. If your local sky isn't really dark, long exposures will bring up the sky level noticeably.

To accentuate the curvature of trails, point closer to a pole, eg north in the Northern hemisphere, even if you don't include the pole. Pointing at the celestial equator could be neat but the arcs will be less apparently curved.

Color film brings out colors in the stars (and the sky glow) that are not visible to the naked eye.

For obvious reasons, any moon beyond a thin crescent will bring up the sky brightness a lot, so you want to work with the moon down when possible. However, if the moon is low on the horizon during your exposure, it won't affect the sky brightness much, and the moonlight gently illuminating the foreground can be interesting. (It can be a warm color at moonrise/set, like sunrise/set, because moonlight is a similar color to sunlight, which is physically reasonable but conceptually difficult for people because we are trained to think of moonlight as "cold.")


[*] A technical note for people who really care: for normal photography, exposure sensitivity depends on aperture and not focal length; but for star photography, focal length also matters because stars are unresolved point sources, not areas of a defined surface brightness.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,800
Location
Plymouth. UK
Format
Multi Format
Thank you all for your help and replies.
Someone has also suggested to me a book about Astrophotography by Michael A Covington which covers film photography. I haven't seen a copy of this book, so I'm not sure if it covers the use of black and white films.
 

kykr

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
31
Location
Northern WI
Format
35mm
A book on astrophotography is probably going to be about how to *not* get star trails. I’ve done some on Provia years ago, and the wider the aperture, the brighter the star trails. B&W usually has more reciprocity failure than slide film but still works.

As mentioned, the two big things are getting away from city lights and trying it with a new moon.
 

Shaps

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2024
Messages
26
Location
Hawaii
Format
Medium Format
Download the Photopills app, very good information on star trails and many other photo things
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,036
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Use the middle f stops for the sharpest and narrow star trails.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom