Thank you for your advice, it's greatly appreciated. Curious, how would the paper towel help?
Tried that. Left terrible water marks.You don't need wetting agent or PhotoFlo. Just use de-ionised water.
Will try.negatives
I see, thank you. That wouldn't account for stains left at the top of the film though.The paper towel draws the water off the corner so that it is less likely for excess water to pool and leave marks on the film.
Drying is carried out in a steamed-up bathroom and left overnight. OK, thank you for the advice. Have tried with fingers and still get them.How fast are you drying the film? More details about the nature of the way the film is dried will help.
What I've found is that Ilfotol's dilution seems intended for filtered, not deionised water - and that it needs properly mixed - and carefully squeegeeing with fingers helps too (the film is plenty tough).
You don't need wetting agent or PhotoFlo. Just use de-ionised water.
Tried that. Left terrible water marks.
Thank you for your help in this, it's much appreciated. I think I will start afresh with the suggested dilution first (everyone keeps saying just 1 or 2 drops!) and then work from there.I take it that initially you used the exact dilution that Ilford recommends and slosh the film in it to make sure that all the Ilfotol gets to all the film? The right dilution is, I suspect, important. All I then do is lift the film out and draw my middle two fingers down the strip a couple of times then give it a shake and hang it up.
Where do you hang it up and is it in a drying chamber or simply hung in the open?
I have never used other than tap water to mix the Ilfotol and in 17 years have never noticed any problems
LIke Andrew I had difficulties seeing your problem. In fact I can only just see, I think, slight marks like drops that may nave dried on the second example. Better pics would really help That brings me to my last point. If what I see is dried drops on the film then can I ask is the film dried in ambient temperature or do you use a hear source to speed it up?
Thanks
pentaxuser
That is what I would have expected. Kodak did not spend money on R&D to develop PhotoFlo as an exercise in wasting money and not did the other companies that manufacture surfactants.
How can de-ionised water leave water marks? It is free of calcium.
Since there is no surfactant the water, even de-ionized, can pool and still leave a stain. That is part of the reason the photochemical manufacturers invested money in developing surfactants.
Perhaps photochemical manufacturers invested money in developing surfactants to make a profit? How can de-ionized water, even if pooled leave a stain?
Whatever water is used, you are probably drying your film in air.
And air can have lots of dust and dirt in it.
If there are pools/droplets of liquid on your film when you hang them to dry, that dust from the air can get into those droplets, and end up being deposited on the film when the droplets evaporate.
Using a surfactant helps limit the amount of water clinging to the film, and therefore limits the amount of dust and dirt from the air that may dry on to the film.
You have relatively clean air. Not everyone does.I let my films dry in ambient temperature, with no drying cabinet blowing dust into the film. So why, If what you say is true, have I had spotless negatives for the past fifty years?
You have relatively clean air. Not everyone does.
Or even better, some place that is really dry and dusty.Well, if what you say is true, I would welcome someone from say smog bound California trying my method and reporting back.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?