ask 10 people and I am sure you will get 12 opinions.
I know that I prefer to Jobo tanks and wish they did not cost as Much. using inversion, the 35mm Jobo takes 290ml, while the stainless takes 240-or 250 Ml for one roll of 35mm film. they do fill and pour quite fast.
I seldom have trouble with loading film into the Jobo reels as long as they are QUITE DRY. I have learned to use the finger cutouts on the side of the reals to tap the film from side to side if it wants to get hung up. You do have to be sure that you trim the film end carefully, and not leave the end if a perforation has been cut through (trim back a bit more)
the Jobo tanks do seal fairly well, and many folks suggest using a "Tupperware Burp" when putting the cap on.
their are some stainless tanks with have a plastic top, and some folks find that they aree less prone to leaking.
Are you using a Jobo processor?
[
Which Jobo 35 mm tank is this? . My Jobo 35mm tank only takes 240ml for one roll of 35mm film. I ask this only because if we are comparing and contrasting SS tanks with Jobo tanks then this might be important
It has been a long time since I developed color film, but I believe you need to "burp" the tank with the blix. after each inversion, pop the fill lid to release the pressure.
Hope that helps you.
It has been a long time since I developed color film, but I believe you need to "burp" the tank with the blix. after each inversion, pop the fill lid to release the pressure.
Hope that helps you.
I said the same more or less in post 7, but also gave the reason why!
Unless you can find a way to stop the gas being produced when you pour blix into a tank that has previously has held developer the you won't eliminate it. A quick rinse with water or stop bath will work - it does for me. As I also suggested a very small hole drilled into the top cap will do the job and release the gas. It only needs to be 1mm or even .5mm to do the trick. This can easily be made watertight afterward with a finger over the hole during agitation.
Not at all. I always use plain water and give it a 30 second rinse using a JOBO rotary between the finish of the developing stage and before putting the blix into the tank. As recommended, drain the developer 10 seconds before the end of that stage and immediately pour in the water.
It has another benefit as well, because the developer is an alkali and mixing that with the blix which is an acid, without the rinse it can shorten the active life of the blix. (The reaction between the two causes the gas that create the leaks) If this is rinsed out first the bleach fix can start immediately and you will find your leaks stop.
If you don't have a JOBO then a 250cc (or whatever capacity your tank is) rinse with water at the same temp as the developer and agitate for 30 seconds will work just as well..
I have an early JOBO 120 tank that came to me with a hole already made in the cap when it was manufactured, so they knew of the problem a long time ago.
I always use a stop bath (acetic acid 1-2%) with c41 and "burp" the tank once after about 10 seconds. This is entirely sufficient to del with the pressure buildup. With just blix (no stop) burping only once should likewise be sufficient. No drilling of holes etc necessary.
And yes, c41 with a stop bath works fine.
Hi everyone,
I've been processing at home for a couple months. I process 35mm and 120 and have the same issue all the time with both of my tanks (Arista 16 ounce and Arista 30 ounce) and lids: blix leaking out from where the lid seats down around the stainless steel canister.
Not sure what it is about the blix (it's not just that I can see the dark color) but whatever isn't airtight in the seals leak like a sieve. I also process all my B+W in the same tanks and never have any problems, nor do I with C41 chemistry, stabilizer, prewash, etc. Just the blix.
I am considering returning the SS tanks and trying the Jobo tank which does 4 rolls of 35 or 2 rolls of 120 because (according to the sales rep I spoke to at Freestyle) the Jobo tanks never leak and you can pour chemistry into them much faster (I hate how long it takes to pour into the 30 ounce SS tank, especially with C41 with such short processing times).
My understanding is Jobo tanks take more chemistry but pour faster and have less of an issue with leaking. I've also heard newbies can get really frustrated with loading film onto the Jobo reels and that Jobos might need more chemistry than an equivalent capacity SS tank.
I was hoping someone with experience with both might share their experience. For now I just do all my processing in a slop sink carefully but I'm really sick of dealing with the leak issue and would love to be able to pour faster.
Thank you!
How come? I have both and overall like my Jobo tanks much more. Neither of them leak, but the Jobos have better reels IMHO, need less chemicals and the tanks feel less brittle. Somehow, every case of bubble related development artifacts I had happened when using my Paterson tank.If you're not running a JOBO processor, I find that they Paterson tanks are generally better. I have both types of tanks, and when I'm not running my JOBO and just doing manual inversion processing, I very much prefer the Paterson Tanks.
How come? I have both and overall like my Jobo tanks much more. Neither of them leak, but the Jobos have better reels IMHO, need less chemicals and the tanks feel less brittle. Somehow, every case of bubble related development artifacts I had happened when using my Paterson tank.
previous owner used photo flo with the film still on the reels.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?