Actually, a 110 negative (or slide) has an image area of 13mm x 17mm, which yields a rectangular print with a roughly 4:5 aspect ratio. There were a lot of prints on 3.5" paper, so the prints were approximately 3.5" x 4.5" in size.110 film always gave a square print.
I ended up buying the Pentax Auto 110. The camera is quite nice but unfortunately the whole experience has still been disappointing. The backing paper on the film often has pinhole light leaks. Also because the Pentax autoselects the iso at (if I remember correctly) 80 iso as "low" and "400" as high the only colour 110 film manufacturer has decided to make 200 iso film. So all my shots are overexposed by the stop and some change. Often the prints are fine but scans have to be adjusted. It's a fun camera but it's a system best left in the past IMO.That being said, 110 is still disappointing. never that good. There is an exception though. The Pentax Auto 100 is an SLR that uses 110 film.
There was another SLR too, and a lot of variations amongst the resting cameras.There is an exception though. The Pentax Auto 100 is an SLR that uses 110 film. Check them out on E-Bay.
Hi there,
I'm thinking about buying the Diana baby 110 camera and as I understand it, it takes a square photo.
Minolta 16s work fine with 16mm movie film. No cutting.Always wanted to try 16mm but didn't want to have to cut my own film
Unless your Minolta 16 takes 100 ft. rolls (and wouldn't that be something!), you cut film to length to reload the cartridges. Not to be confused with slitting film down from wider formats like 120 or 35mm. A 100 ft. roll of film lasts a long time and single perf is preferred to double perf, although with the earlier Minolta models it made no difference.Minolta 16s work fine with 16mm movie film. No cutting.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?