SPUR B&W developers - experience and distribution in US

blee1996

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
1,244
Location
SF Bay Area, California
Format
Multi Format
Hi

I have seen recent recommendations of SPUR HRX developer for Acros II 100 and TMAX 100. I have also seen great results from SPUR Acurol-N with Foma 100, on photo.net.

I'm not familiar with SPUR as a company, and there is limited distribution in the US (only Freestyle carries SPUR HRX alone).

I would like to start this thread not only to share experiences with their B&W developers, but also hopefully petition US stores to carry their products.

Thanks!
 

Henning Serger

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
2,196
Format
Multi Format

As I know the company very well from a critical customer point of view, and using several of their products very successfully for many years, I can give some more detailed information.
First about the background of the German company SPUR ( https://spur-photo.com/ ):
The founder and master-mind of SPUR is Diplom-Ingenieur Heribert Schain. He studied photo engineering at the University of Cologne, and set his main focus on photo-chemistry already as a student there. After finishing the studies with the diploma he started his professional career in R&D and production of BW photo chemistry.

His main focus has been innovative R&D and trying completely new approaches for significant performance improvements especially for BW developers.
He has developed / designed all kind of new developers, from developers for high-volume developing machines to special high-performance developers for niche special films. But also high-quality general purpose developers like HRX, Acurol-N, SD2525, SLD.
During his career he has designed / developed dozens of different developers. He is most probably the most productive / active researcher / photo chemist in history concerning BW developers. At least I don't know anyone else who has designed so much different BW developers.
During the last 20 years alone he has every year either introduced at least one completely new developer, or a further improved version of one of his established developers (including the developers he has designed and is producing for other brands).
He is a person who just really loves to do R&D in BW chemistry and improving products. He is living for that.

He is definitely the best expert worldwide concerning special developers for highest-performing special films like microfilms, and for ultra-fine grain developers which also offer excellent sharpness.
A general very positive experience I've made over the years: When I have discussed my results with his developers with him, and when I had critic and wasn't fully satiesfied with a new product (that happen't really very rarely, though), he has been always very open minded and listened. And if possible, he tried to further improve the critical parameter / weakness I found in my tests.

When I started my big scientific comparison film test project, I tested several developers and had then chosen SPUR HRX as my standard test developer for the BW films, because I've got with most films the best results concerning fineness of grain and sharpness with HRX. As I wanted to see how good the films generally can perform in detail rendition, for that approach it has been the optimal developer.

These days SPUR has just introduced another new developer: Omega X. It was designed to even surpass the outstanding results of HRX. And it is also a reaction to the really excellent JOBO Alpha developer.
I have not yet tested Omega X. Therefore I cannot yet assess its performance.

Best regards,
Henning
 

Angarian

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
231
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I am using SPUR developers regularly:

Acurol-N:
High acutance developer. Delivers sharper results than Rodinal, and is a bit finer grained than Rodinal. Very flexible concerning dilution.

HRX:
Offers much finer grain and much better sharpness than ID-11, D-76, HC-110, Rodinal, Ultrafin liquid, T-Max dev.
Delta 100, TMX and Acros 35mm developed in HRX bring you quite close to the performance of conventional emulsion type films like Fomapan 100, Kentmere 100 in 4.5x6 / 6x6.

Shadowmax:
Best developer for the rare cases when I need to push TMY-2.
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,432
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
It baffles me why SPUR film developers aren't more popular in the USA and, basically other than HRX, are unavailable. Years ago, I used to order several bottles of Acurol-N directly from Mr. Schain but at some point (probably Covid-related) that path dried up. I really liked that formula with many film B&W film stocks and it had a long shelf life even after opening. I've toyed with ordering it from fotoimpex, but would need to get up a decent order to make the shipping worthwhile.
 

Tomro

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Messages
116
Location
Italy
Format
Medium Format

since HRX seems to offer two (sharpness, fine grain) out of three/four: how about tonality? Speed is not so much a concern. Like with Acurol-N, which I like a lot, and I don't mind the one stop of loss in speed.
 

Angarian

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
231
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
since HRX seems to offer two (sharpness, fine grain) out of three/four: how about tonality? Speed is not so much a concern. Like with Acurol-N, which I like a lot, and I don't mind the one stop of loss in speed.

Tonality is excellent. No danger of getting too high density in the highlights as with some popular standard developers sometimes (Rodinal and HC-110 in certain dilutions).
The extremely fine grain also improves the tonality, as by that finer tonal steps are delivered. You can make significantly bigger enlargements of HRX-developed negatives compared to Rodinal, ID-11, HC-110, D-76, X-Tol, T-Max Dev.
 

Henning Serger

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
2,196
Format
Multi Format
Thank you @Henning Serger and @Angarian for sharing your detailed experience with SPUR developers. I will definitely give HRX a try: it is a bit pricey for B&W developer, but it's good to support innovation from Mr. Schain and his small business.

You're welcome.
Concerning the price for HRX: Price is what you pay, value is what you get. The costs for BW film development are overall so extremely low, that some cent more per film are negligible for me.
And I get significantly finer grain, better sharpness and higher resolution compared to the old, wide-spread conventional standard developers.
A better performance which I see in my optical prints. That counts for me.

Best regards,
Henning
 

Henning Serger

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
2,196
Format
Multi Format

I can confirm that from my test results and my usage of HRX for about 20 years.

Best regards,
Henning
 

JParker

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2022
Messages
243
Location
European in Australia
Format
Multi Format
Before I moved to down-under I had used SPUR developers regularly (unfortunately they are not available here; but supply is generally not as good here as in good old Europe).
The special developers for high-resolution microfilm, HRX, Acurol-N and SLD being my favourite developers. Excellent stuff!!
Much better than any of the old but widespread developers like D-76, XTOL, HC-110, T-Max. dev.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…