Don Wallace
Allowing Ads
Matte paper is much easier to spot. It is often hard to see where you've actualy spotted. With glossy, I'd rather reprint than have to do any major spotting. The gloss difference between the paper and the spotted area isn't that bad under glass, though.
I am not very good at spotting prints and I am wondering if, in addition to my basic ineptitude, the problem is glossy paper. I can't seem to get the dye INTO the paper. It sort of sits on top. Would matte paper be more porous?
.... I also used engineering pencils of various hardnesses to spot prints as well as negatives...
I spot slowly, a dot at a time, and I always wind up with the same thing: the same damn almost pure white dot surrounded by a ring of density darker than the face, more obvious than when I started!
...
I am still practising and I am getting somewhere, if slowly. I started using sharpened toothpicks (thanks for the suggestion) and that seems to work a little better for me. One of the things that still throws me is the classic tiny pure white dot. If it is in a sea of black, I can get rid of it, but on a face it is very difficult. I spot slowly, a dot at a time, and I always wind up with the same thing: the same damn almost pure white dot surrounded by a ring of density darker than the face, more obvious than when I started!
Another thing: I am using Marshall's Spot-All but the neutral black has a lot of blue in it, in my opinion. I suppose that won't really matter in very tiny amounts. Or will it? Is Spottone still available and if so, do I need it? Are there other, more neutral blacks?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?