Split-grade headache

Flow of thoughts

D
Flow of thoughts

  • 2
  • 0
  • 41
Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 5
  • 3
  • 67
Plague

D
Plague

  • 0
  • 0
  • 51
Vinsey

A
Vinsey

  • 3
  • 1
  • 87

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,162
Messages
2,787,265
Members
99,828
Latest member
Photodegree
Recent bookmarks
1

Blighty

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
914
Location
Lancaster, N
Format
Multi Format
Fellow Apuggers, I'm a dyed in the wool split-grade printer. Usually, but not exclusively, I'll determine the G.00 exposure first and build the shadows in later. Sometimes, when dealing with a low contrast image, I'll figure the G.5 exposure first and build the highlights last. Today, I printed a very low contrast image. The G.5 exposure was set at 20.1 secs but subsequent testing showed a G.00 exposure of just 4 seconds . Luckily, my Stopclock pro is accurate enough for this not to be a problem. My point (eventually) is, when making your exposures in this way, make sure you give yourself a long enough G.5 exposure to give yourself a long enough soft exposure. Regards, B.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,560
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
That seems right. With Ilford MG I get a ratio of blue to green of 4.25 at ISO(R) 70 which is similar to what you have posted. Now, on the other end, the ratios are more skewed. For example to get an ISO(R) of 160 my ratio of blue to green is 0.0625
 

Katie

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
765
Location
Texas, USA
Format
Multi Format
I have this same problem with a few of my prints that are backlighted. I am about to make a post about it. I guess I need to stop the lens down and re-do it. My last 0 exposure time was 2 seconds!!!
 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
3,009
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
Unless you're dodging during the grade 00 exposure to increase contrast in certain areas of the print it may just be easier to go with something like grade 4 exclusively for the exposure. Every image demands a different approach of course.
 

Katie

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
765
Location
Texas, USA
Format
Multi Format
What do I do in this case.

My times were 2-4 seconds on 0 and 25-35 seconds on a 5. I am still not happy with these prints, but had to go to bed last night (was printing until 12 midnight). Should I try to stop the lens down and re-do test strips or how can I get my highlights/upper-midtones lighter? I'm not happy with the skintones, they still seem dark to me. I also would like a TAD more contrast overall.

Please excuse these crappy super-quick scans. The second one you can see my TERRIBLE attempt at dodging the face area. Not working here... losing too much contrast! I cannot dodge the grade 5 exposure (this was at 5 seconds). This is also the image with the 2 second 0 exposure ...
 

Attachments

  • img507.jpg
    img507.jpg
    221.3 KB · Views: 126
  • img506.jpg
    img506.jpg
    218.4 KB · Views: 122
OP
OP

Blighty

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
914
Location
Lancaster, N
Format
Multi Format
Unless you're dodging during the grade 00 exposure to increase contrast in certain areas of the print it may just be easier to go with something like grade 4 exclusively for the exposure. Every image demands a different approach of course.
Hi Brian; I use both methods but as a rule I tend to aim for an exposure around 20 sec for the soft exposure. With the majority of my negs falling in the G.2~G.3 range this provides conveniently short times for the hard exposures. Automatically giving a 20 sec (ish) exposure on G.5 was my mistake. Regards, B.
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
I always do the G 00 exposure first, particularly with lo con as it does build shadows. When I work the other way around I find myself adding to blacks I'm happy with. YMMV.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
From extremely low contrast negatives you have little to gain from the low contrast exposure. Like Brian suggests, going directly for a high contrast filter and printing the picture with just one filter is usually a better solution. Or, you might try to make your 'low' contrast filter a Grade 2.5 or 3, and use Grade 5 as your high contrast filter. Look at some alternatives, try a few things.

And, while on the subject, don't think that split grade printing is limited to just one low contrast and one high contrast filter. Most my prints will print without the need for split grade printing at around Grade 3 for 35mm. But sometimes I need some extra contrast in the highlights, (like a sky with clouds), and will then burn that in with a Grade 5. Or similarly, if I need extra weight to the shadows, I'll do the same.

There are two really big reasons to take advantage of split grade printing:
1. If you have a very high contrast negative, it may be your only way to obtain a complete range of tones.
2. If you want to dodge and burn areas of your prints at different filtration.

- Thomas
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom